Author:
Hofverberg Anders,Eklöf Hanna,Lindfors Maria
Abstract
Each time new PISA results are presented, they gain a lot of attention. However, there are many factors that lie behind the results, and they get less attention. In this study, we take a person-centered approach and focus on students’ motivation and beliefs, and how these predict students’ effort and performance on the PISA 2015 assessment of scientific literacy. Moreover, we use both subjective (self-report) and objective (time-based) measures of effort, which allows us to compare these different types of measures. Latent profile analysis was used to group students in profiles based on their instrumental motivation, enjoyment, interest, self-efficacy, and epistemic beliefs (all with regard to science). A solution with four profiles proved to be best. When comparing the effort and performance of these four profiles, we saw several significant differences, but many of these differences disappeared when we added gender and the PISA index of economic, social, and cultural status (ESCS) as control variables. The main difference between the profiles, after adding control variables, was that the students in the profile with most positive motivation and sophisticated epistemic beliefs performed best and put in the most effort. Students in the profile with unsophisticated epistemic beliefs and low intrinsic values (enjoyment and interest) were most likely to be classified as low-effort responders. We conclude that strong motivation and sophisticated epistemic beliefs are important for both the effort students put into the PISA assessment and their performance, but also that ESCS had an unexpectedly large impact on the results.
Reference58 articles.
1. Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Using the BCH Method in Mplus to Estimate a Distal Outcome Model and an Arbitrary Secondary Model
AsparouhovT.
MuthénB. O.
2020
2. Are Sophisticated Students Always Better? the Role of Topic-specific Personal Epistemology in the Understanding of Multiple Expository Texts;Bråten;Contemp. Educ. Psychol.,2008
3. The Impact of Differential Investment of Student Effort on the Outcomes of International Studies;Butler;J. Appl. Meas.,2007
4. Intrinsic Motivation and Sophisticated Epistemic Beliefs Are Promising Pathways to Science Achievement: Evidence from High Achieving Regions in the East and the West;Chai;Front. Psychol.,2021
5. Implicit Theories, Epistemic Beliefs, and Science Motivation: A Person-Centered Approach;Chen;Learn. Individual Differences,2012
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献