Author:
Belot Rose-Angélique,Bouteloup Margaux,Mariage André,Candilis-huisman Drina,Mottet Nicolas,Mellier Denis
Abstract
Objective: To compare the Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale results in two groups of infants with or without somatic disorder (N = 26).Method: The Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale was administered to two groups (clinical and control) of 13 infants each, aged from 5 to 18 weeks, matched 2 by 2 according to sex, age, rank among siblings, and parental socio-professional category. The first group includes infants with somatic disorder (clinical) and is matched with a second group of “healthy infants” (control).Results: Results indicate that the mean score of the control group is significantly higher than that of the clinical group. Most of the items are affected by the presence of a somatic disorder. Indeed, five out of the six categories present a statistically significant difference in favor of the control group, more specifically for the items “state regulation,” “motor system,” and “orientation/interaction.”Conclusion: This exploratory research enables a precise description of infants' difficulty in regulating excitations and the impact of somatic disorders on their development. This innovative knowledge will assist pediatricians and health professionals in the understanding of infants' characteristics to develop an adapted-care.
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference40 articles.
1. Feeding development and disorders;Chatoor;Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development,2008
2. Early feeding problems in a normal sample;Lindberg;Int J Eat Disord,1991
3. Early development of children at risk for emotional disorder;Sameroff;Monogr Soc Res Child Dev,1982
4. Feeding disorders in infants and toddlers: diagnosis and treatment;Chatoor;Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am,2002
5. Why are they having infant colic? A nested case–control study;Yalcin;Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol,2010
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献