Factor Analysis of the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease and Healthy Controls

Author:

Tran Nhu N.12ORCID,Desai Jay3,Votava-Smith Jodie K.4,Brecht Mary-Lynn5,Vanderbilt Douglas L.2,Panigrahy Ashok6,Mackintosh Liza7,Brady Kenneth M.8,Peterson Bradley S.19

Affiliation:

1. Institute for the Developing Mind, The Saban Research Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

2. Fetal and Neonatal Institute, Division of Neonatology Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

3. Division of Neurology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

4. Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

5. School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA

6. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA and Department of Pediatric Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA

7. Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

8. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA

9. Department of Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

Abstract

Background: Administration of the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale (ENNAS) can be time-consuming, and items can be highly correlated. We aimed to determine: (1) its factor analytic structure; (2) the validity of the factor structure; and (3) the associations of physiologic measures with factor scores. Methods: A factor analysis reduced 21 ENNAS items into 5 factors in 57 congenital heart disease (CHD) and 35 healthy infants. Multiple linear regressions examined the association of factor scores with group, gestational age, and physiologic variables. Results: 5-factor solution: 1 (Orienting Reflex), 2 (Extensor Axial Tone), 3 (Primitive Reflexes), 4 (Flexor Tone), 5 (Reflexive Tone Around Extremity Joints). Moderate to strong evidence supported: face, discriminant, and construct validity of these factors, with Factor 2 having the strongest. Conclusions: Components of Factor 2 may provide similar information about neonatal development, thus reducing the time for and burden of administration for researchers and clinicians.

Funder

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute

National Institute of Nursing Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3