The Comparison of Three Assessment Scales in a Neonatal Unit in Poland
-
Published:2021-12-01
Issue:3
Volume:66
Page:635-646
-
ISSN:2199-6059
-
Container-title:Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Tabaczyńska Aleksandra1, Malak Roksana1, Fechner Brittany1, Mojs Ewa2, Samborski Włodzimierz1, Baum Ewa3
Affiliation:
1. Department and Clinic of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation and Internal Diseases , Poznan University of Medical Science , Poland 2. Department of Clinical Psychology , Poznan University of Medical Sciences , Poland 3. Department of Social Sciences and the Humanities , Poznan University of Medical Sciences , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between the following three assessments: the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS), the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), and the General Movement Assessment (GMA). 29 patients from the neonatal unit of the Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Hospital were examined. The study was conducted between feedings by a person properly trained in the use of the NBAS, the AIMS, and the GMA. The average postmenstrual age of the examined newborns was 35.6 weeks. The average week of gestation was the 29th, the average birth weight was 1469 g, and the Median Apgar score in the fifth minute of life was 7. A relationship was found between the AIMS and the NBAS. It was concluded that the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale may be used to determine the motor development of preterm infants. Moreover, it is advisable to use more than one assessment method in order to adjust the intervention.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference22 articles.
1. Alvarez-Garcia, A., Fornieles-Deu, A., Costas-Moragas, C., & Botet-Mussons, F. (2015). Neurobehavioral conditions and effects of gender, weight and severity in preterm infants according to the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. Anales de Psicologia, 31(3), 818–824. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.3.17018110.6018/analesps.31.3.170181 2. Amini, M., Aliabadi, F., Alizade, M., Kalani, M., & Qorbani, M. (2016). The Relationship between Motor Function and Behavioral Function in Infants with Low Birth Weight. Iran J Child Neurol., 10(4): 49–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v10i4.10965 3. Auber, E. (2008). The variability of human growth and development. In J. S. Tecklin (Ed.), Pediatric Physical Therapy. Fourth edition (pp. 17–20). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194263080230965110.1080/01942630802309651 4. Barbosa, V. M., Campbell, S. K., Sheftel, D., Singh, J., & Beligere, N. (2003). Longitudinal performance of infants with cerebral palsy on the Test of Infant Motor Performance and on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23(3): 7–29. doi: 10.1080/j006v23n03_0210.1080/J006v23n03_02 5. Belot, R. A., Bouteloup, M., Mariage, A., Candilis-huisman, D., Mottet, N., & Mellier, D. (2021). Relevance of Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale for Infants With Somatic Disorders: Comparison on One Matched Group of Control. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 8, 506384. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.50638410.3389/fped.2020.506384
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|