Author:
Dryhurst Sarah,Mulder Femke,Dallo Irina,Kerr John R.,McBride Sara K.,Fallou Laure,Becker Julia S.
Abstract
Misinformation carries the potential for immense damage to public understanding of science and for evidence-based decision making at an individual and policy level. Our research explores the following questions within seismology: which claims can be considered misinformation, which are supported by a consensus, and which are still under scientific debate? Consensus and debate are important to quantify, because where levels of scientific consensus on an issue are high, communication of this fact may itself serve as a useful tool in combating misinformation. This is a challenge for earthquake science, where certain theories and facts in seismology are still being established. The present study collates a list of common public statements about earthquakes and provides–to the best of our knowledge–the first elicitation of the opinions of 164 earth scientists on the degree of verity of these statements. The results provide important insights for the state of knowledge in the field, helping identify those areas where consensus messaging may aid in the fight against earthquake related misinformation and areas where there is currently lack of consensus opinion. We highlight the necessity of using clear, accessible, jargon-free statements with specified parameters and precise wording when communicating with the public about earthquakes, as well as of transparency about the uncertainties around some issues in seismology.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference60 articles.
1. Communicating earthquake risk to the public: The trial of the “L’Aquila Seven;Alexander;Nat. Hazards (Dordr).,2014
2. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election;Allcott;J. Econ. Perspect.,2017
3. The negative consequences of failing to communicate uncertainties during a pandemic: The case of COVID-19 vaccines;Batteux;Cold Spring Harb. Lab. Press,2021
4. When the Earth doesn’t stop shaking: How experiences over time influenced information needs, communication, and interpretation of aftershock information during the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, New Zealand;Becker,2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献