Towards a dynamic earthquake risk framework for Switzerland
-
Published:2024-02-16
Issue:2
Volume:24
Page:583-607
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Böse Maren, Danciu LaurentiuORCID, Papadopoulos Athanasios, Clinton JohnORCID, Cauzzi CarloORCID, Dallo IrinaORCID, Mizrahi LeilaORCID, Diehl TobiasORCID, Bergamo PaoloORCID, Reuland YvesORCID, Fichtner AndreasORCID, Roth PhilippeORCID, Haslinger FlorianORCID, Massin Frédérick, Valenzuela Nadja, Blagojević Nikola, Bodenmann LukasORCID, Chatzi Eleni, Fäh Donat, Glueer Franziska, Han MartaORCID, Heiniger Lukas, Janusz Paulina, Jozinović Dario, Kästli PhilippORCID, Lanza FedericaORCID, Lee Timothy, Martakis PanagiotisORCID, Marti MichèleORCID, Meier Men-AndrinORCID, Mena Cabrera Banu, Mesimeri MariaORCID, Obermann AnneORCID, Sanchez-Pastor PilarORCID, Scarabello Luca, Schmid NicolasORCID, Shynkarenko Anastasiia, Stojadinović Bozidar, Giardini DomenicoORCID, Wiemer Stefan
Abstract
Abstract. Scientists from different disciplines at ETH Zurich are developing a dynamic, harmonised, and user-centred earthquake risk framework for Switzerland, relying on a continuously evolving earthquake catalogue generated by the Swiss Seismological Service (SED) using the national seismic networks. This framework uses all available information to assess seismic risk at various stages and facilitates widespread dissemination and communication of the resulting information. Earthquake risk products and services include operational earthquake (loss) forecasting (OE(L)F), earthquake early warning (EEW), ShakeMaps, rapid impact assessment (RIA), structural health monitoring (SHM), and recovery and rebuilding efforts (RRE). Standardisation of products and workflows across various applications is essential for achieving broad adoption, universal recognition, and maximum synergies. In the Swiss dynamic earthquake risk framework, the harmonisation of products into seamless solutions that access the same databases, workflows, and software is a crucial component. A user-centred approach utilising quantitative and qualitative social science tools like online surveys and focus groups is a significant innovation featured in all products and services. Here we report on the key considerations and developments of the framework and its components. This paper may serve as a reference guide for other countries wishing to establish similar services for seismic risk reduction.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference155 articles.
1. Ajo-Franklin, J., Dou, S., Lindsey, N., Monga, I., Tracy, C., Robertson, M., Rodriguez Tribaldos, V., Ulrich, C., Freifeld, B., Daley, T., and Li, X.: Distributed acoustic sensing using dark fiber for near-surface characterisation and broadband seismic event detection, Sci. Rep., 9, 1328, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36675-8, 2019. 2. Al Atik, L., Abrahamson, N., Bommer, J. J., Scherbaum, F., Cotton, F., and Kuehn, N.: The Variability of Ground-Motion Prediction Models and Its Components, Seismol. Res. Lett., 81, 794–801, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.81.5.794, 2010. 3. Allen, R. M., Gasparini, P., Kamigaichi, O., and Böse, M.: The status of earthquake early warning around the world: an introductory overview, Seismol. Res. Lett., 80, 682–693, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.5.682, 2009. 4. Armbruster, D., Mesimeri, M., Kästli, P., Diehl, T., Massin, F., and Wiemer, S.: SCDetect: Near real-time computationally efficient waveform cross-correlation based earthquake detection during intense earthquake sequences, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-12443, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-12443, 2022. 5. Bayliss, K., Naylor, M., Kamranzad, F., and Main, I.: Pseudo-prospective testing of 5-year earthquake forecasts for California using inlabru, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3231–3246, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3231-2022, 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|