Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Provided by Different Rural Landscape
Author:
Bartolini Fabio1ORCID, Vergamini Daniele2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy 2. Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
Abstract
Ecosystems in rural areas play a crucial role in promoting human well-being and economic development by providing essential resources such as food, water, raw materials, and energy. Furthermore, rural ecosystems offer various services, such as recreational opportunities, climate regulation, biodiversity conservation, and environmental mitigation. However, a narrow focus on provisioning services has led to the standardisation of landscapes, decreased levels of biodiversity and reduced ecosystem services in several areas. Moreover, diverse rural landscapes can enrich the provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting services. While much research has explored the relationship between land use, landscape, and ecosystem services, there is still a need to better understand the trade-offs and synergies between these factors in providing ecosystem services. To address this gap, we conducted an empirical analysis of the perception of ecosystem services provided by different rural landscapes in the Tuscany region. Specifically, we used the concept of morphotypes, which describes ‘invariants’ that distinguish six different rural landscape typologies in the region. We surveyed 28 experts to identify rural landscape contributions to 17 ecosystem services. Our results provide empirical evidence and insight into the mechanisms necessary to align the provision of ecosystem services by rural landscapes with current and future needs.
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference60 articles.
1. The Authorship Structure of “Ecosystem Services” as a Transdisciplinary Field of Scholarship;Costanza;Ecosyst. Serv.,2012 2. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital;Costanza;Nature,1997 3. Levy, M., Babu, S.C., Hamilton, K., Rhoe, V., Catenazzi, A., Chen, M., Reid, W.V., Sengupta, D., Ximing, C., and Balmford, A. (2012). Ecosystem Conditions and Human Well-Being, FAO. 4. Shi, M., Wu, H., Fan, X., Jia, H., Dong, T., He, P., Baqa, M.F., and Jiang, P. (2021). Trade-Offs and Synergies of Multiple Ecosystem Services for Different Land Use Scenarios in the Yili River Valley, China. Sustainability, 13. 5. Ecosystem Services Classification: A Systems Ecology Perspective of the Cascade Framework;Paracchini;Ecol. Indic.,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|