Expanding Models for Physics Teaching: A Framework for the Integration of Computational Modeling

Author:

Vieyra Rebecca1ORCID,Megowan-Romanowicz Colleen2,Fisler Kathi3ORCID,Lerner Benjamin4ORCID,Politz Joe5ORCID,Krishnamurthi Shriram3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA

2. American Modeling Teachers Association, Sacramento, CA 95820, USA

3. Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA

4. Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA

5. Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA

Abstract

Teaching computation in science courses can enhance science education, but doing so requires that teachers expand the vision of their discipline beyond the traditional view of science presented in most curricula. This article describes a design-based research (DBR) program that included collaboration among high school teachers and professional development leaders in physics and computer science education. Through three years of professional development and teacher-led development, field testing, and refinement of integrated curricular resources, we have combined instructional modeling practices, physical lab materials, and computer programming activities. One of the outcomes is a co-created framework for the integration of computational modeling into physics that is sensitive to teachers’ interests and expressed needs in addition to learning goals. This framework merges two evidence-based approaches to teaching: Bootstrap:Algebra, a web-based computing curriculum that emphasizes using multiple representations of functions and scaffolds that make the programming process explicit, and Modeling Instruction in physics, an approach that emphasizes the use of conceptual models, modeling practices and representational tools. In doing so, we uncover the need to balance teachers’ visions for integration opportunities with practical instructional needs and emphasize that frameworks for integration need to reflect teachers’ values and goals.

Funder

100Kin10

National Science Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference61 articles.

1. AAPT (2016). AAPT Recommendations for Computational Physics in the Undergraduate Physics Curriculum, American Association of Physics Teachers. Available online: https://www.aapt.org/resources/upload/aapt_uctf_compphysreport_final_b.pdf.

2. (2018). Workshop to Develop an Interdisciplinary Framework for Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Science, Mathematics, Technology, and Engineering Education (Standard No. NSF #1647018).

3. Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms;Weintrop;J. Sci. Educ. Technol.,2016

4. Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework;Sengupta;Educ. Inf. Technol.,2013

5. Weller, D.P., Bott, T.E., Caballero, M.D., and Irving, P.W. (2021). Developing a learning goal framework for computational thinking in computationally integrated physics classrooms. arXiv.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3