Affiliation:
1. School of Engineering Pedagogy, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi City 100000, Vietnam
2. Department of Education Quality Assurance, National College for Education (Vietnam), Hanoi City 100000, Vietnam
Abstract
5E-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (5E-STEM) education is known to be one of the most used pedagogical models in STEM-oriented science courses for middle school students. However, the 5E model lacks a clear explanation of how STEM subjects are strongly linked in each of its operational “E”. In this study, a novel approach was proposed with the use of the argumentation-supported 5E-STEM (A-5E-STEM) model in the science curriculum. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in learning achievements, learning motivation, learning interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students between teaching science using A-5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and conventional didactic methods. A semi-experimental study with post-test only non-equivalent groups design was used. A “Separating Mixtures” unit in the 6th grade Natural Science curriculum was designed with A-5E-STEM and 5E-STEM model orientation. The participants were three 6th grade classes with a total of one hundred and twenty students at a public middle school in Hanoi City, Vietnam. The first experimental group was taught science using the A-5E-STEM model, the second experimental group was taught science using the 5E-STEM model, and a control group was taught the science unit with conventional didactic methods. A post-test was used to collect data on learning achievement, and questionnaires were used to collect data on learning motivation, interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students in the science curriculum. The findings showed that the effect of teaching science using the A-5E-STEM model on learning achievement, motivation, interest, and higher-order thinking skills of middle school students was significantly superior to that of the 5E-STEM model and conventional didactic methods. Therefore, science teachers are expected to increase the use of the A-5E-STEM model in their related curriculum.
Subject
Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Reference35 articles.
1. Understanding STEM: Current perceptions;Brown;Technol. Eng. Teach.,2011
2. Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM;Roehrig;Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res.,2021
3. Community of Practice in Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Literature Review;Han;J. STEM Teach. Educ.,2021
4. Meta-analytic and meta-thematic analysis of STEM education;Batdi;Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol.,2019
5. A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education;Kelley;Int. J. STEM Educ.,2016
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献