Author:
Babou Asma Id,Selmaoui Sabah,Alami Anouar,Benjelloun Nadia,Zaki Moncef
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify">In teaching, students' representations could constitute an obstacle to the construction of scientific knowledge and are often considered stable cognitive structures whose organization is sought to be inferred through questionnaires and interviews. This study aims at identifying and analyzing high school students’ representations related to the concept of biodiversity. To meet this objective, a semi-structured interview and a questionnaire were used to collect data. 202 Moroccan students participated in this survey (46.5% from rural areas and 53.5% from urban areas of the "Direction Provinciale" of education of Guelmim city in Morocco). The results of the interview indicated that only 1.82% of the students gave a definition that consists of the three biodiversity dimensions, namely the species, the ecosystems, and the genetic diversity. The questionnaire results revealed a low to medium correlation between their representations and their acquired knowledge related to the concept of biodiversity dealt with in Moroccan school programs (from the discipline of "scientific activity" in the primary cycle and that of "life and earth sciences" in the secondary cycle). The results further indicated a low presence of supervised activities related to biodiversity within the school and therefore a low degree of influence on the students' representations. It was concluded that there was no effective transmission or adequate assimilation of the concept of biodiversity among the students surveyed.</p>
Publisher
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Reference45 articles.
1. Arbuthnott, K. D., & Devoe, D. (2014). Understanding of biodiversity among Western Canadian University Students. Human Ecology, 42, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9611-y
2. Arnould, P. (2006). Biodiversité : La confusion des chiffres et des territoires [Biodiversity : The confusion of figures and territories]. Annales de Géographie, 5(651), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.651.0528
3. Astolfi, J.-P. (1990). Les concepts de la didactique des sciences, des outils pour lire et construire les situations d’apprentissage [The concepts of science didactics, tools to read and build learning situations]. Recherche & Formation, 8, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.3406/refor.1990.1021
4. Astolfi, J.-P., Darot, É., Ginsburger-Vogel, Y., & Toussaint, J. (2008). Représentation (ou conception). [Representation (or Conception)]. In J. Astolfi, É. Darot, Y. Ginsburger-Vogel & J. Toussaint (Eds.), Mots-clés de la didactique des sciences: Repère, définitions, bibliographies [Keywords of science teaching: References, definitions, bibliographies] (pp. 147-157). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.astol.2008.01.0147
5. Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique : Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance [La formation de l’esprit scientifique : Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance]. Librairie Philosophique J. Virin.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献