Generation of Medical Case-Based Multiple-Choice Questions

Author:

Al Shuriaqi Somaiya1ORCID,Aal Abdulsalam Abdulrahman1ORCID,Masters Ken2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 243, Muscat 123, Oman

2. Medical Education and Informatics Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 243, Muscat 123, Oman

Abstract

This narrative review is a detailed look at how we make multiple-choice questions (MCQs) based on medical cases in today’s medical teaching. Moving from old-style MCQs to ones that are more related to real clinical situations is really important. It helps in growing critical thinking and practical use, especially since MCQs are still the primary method for testing knowledge in medicine. We look at the history, design ideas, and both manual and computer-based methods that have helped create MCQs. Technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) are receiving a lot of focus for their ability to automate the creation of question. We also talk about the challenges of using real patient cases, like the need for exact clinical information, reducing unclear information, and thinking about ethical issues. We also investigate the measures of validity and reliability that are crucial to maintaining the honesty of case-based MCQs. Finally, we look ahead, speculating on where medical education is headed as new technologies are incorporated and the value of case-based evaluations continues to rise.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference38 articles.

1. Comparative assessment of multiple choice questions versus short essay questions in pharmacology examinations;Mujeeb;Indian J. Med. Sci.,2010

2. Teaching Critical Thinking without (Much) Writing: Multiple-Choice and Metacognition;Bassett;Teach. Theol. Relig.,2016

3. Evaluation of Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as a tool for Assessing the Cognitive Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students;Khan;Int. J. Health Sci.,2011

4. Ontology-Based Generation of Medical, Multi-term MCQs;Leo;Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ.,2019

5. Chéron, M., Ademi, M., Kraft, F., and Löffler-Stastka, H. (2016). Case-based learning and multiple choice questioning methods favored by students. BMC Med. Educ., 16.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3