Affiliation:
1. Department of Modern and Classical Language Studies, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44240, USA
Abstract
Translation process research (TPR) has generated a large number of models that aim at explaining human translation processes. In this paper, I suggest an extension of the monitor model to incorporate aspects of relevance theory (RT) and to adopt the free energy principle (FEP) as a generative model to elucidate translational behaviour. The FEP—and its corollary, active inference—provide a general, mathematical framework to explain how organisms resist entropic erosion so as to remain within their phenotypic bounds. It posits that organisms reduce the gap between their expectations and observations by minimising a quantity called free energy. I map these concepts on the translation process and exemplify them with behavioural data. The analysis is based on the notion of translation units (TUs) which exhibit observable traces of the translator’s epistemic and pragmatic engagement with their translation environment, (i.e., the text) that can be measured in terms of translation effort and effects. Sequences of TUs cluster into translation states (steady state, orientation, and hesitation). Drawing on active inference, sequences of translation states combine into translation policies that reduce expected free energy. I show how the notion of free energy is compatible with the concept of relevance, as developed in RT, and how essential concepts of the monitor model and RT can be formalised as deep temporal generative models that can be interpreted under a representationalist view, but also support a non-representationalist account.
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference66 articles.
1. Models of the Translation Process: Claim and Reality;Target Int. J. Transl. Stud.,1989
2. Carl, M., and Schaeffer, M.J. (2017). The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. Chapter 3.
3. Setton, R. (2013). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Willey-Blackwell.
4. Strömqvist, S., and Karlsson, H. (2001). Scriptlog for Windows: Users Manual, University of Lund.
5. Leijten, M., and Waes, L.V. (2013). Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes. Writ. Commun., 30.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献