Abstract
Automated citation analysis is becoming increasingly important in assessing the scientific quality of publications and identifying patterns of collaboration among researchers. However, little attention has been paid to analyzing the scientific content of the citation context. This study presents an unsupervised citation detection method that uses semantic similarities between citations and candidate sentences to identify implicit citations, determine their functions, and analyze their sentiments. We propose different document vector models based on TF-IDF weights and word vectors and compare them empirically to calculate their semantic similarity. To validate this model for identifying implicit citations, we used deep neural networks and LDA topic modeling on two citation datasets. The experimental results show that the F1 values for the implicit citation classification are 88.60% and 86.60% when the articles are presented in abstract and full-text form, respectively. Based on the citation function, the results show that implicit citations provide background information and a technical basis, while explicit citations emphasize research motivation and comparative results. Based on the citation sentiment, the results showed that implicit citations tended to describe the content objectively and were generally neutral, while explicit citations tended to describe the content positively. This study highlights the importance of identifying implicit citations for research evaluation and illustrates the difficulties researchers face when analyzing the citation context.
Reference48 articles.
1. A survey on sentiment analysis of scientific citations;Artif. Intell. Rev.,2017
2. Evaluating research and researchers by the journal impact factor: Is it better than coin FLIPPING?;J. Informetr.,2019
3. Aspect based citation sentiment analysis using linguistic patterns for better comprehension of scientific knowledge;Scientometrics,2019
4. Aksnes, D.W., Langfeldt, L., and Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. SAGE Open, 9.
5. Cohan, A., Ammar, W., Van Zuylen, M., and Cady, F. (2019). Structural scaffolds for citation intent classification in scientific publications. arXiv.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献