Polarizing Topics on Twitter in the 2022 United States Elections

Author:

Katalinić Josip1,Dunđer Ivan1,Seljan Sanja1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Information and Communication Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Politically polarizing issues are a growing concern around the world, creating divisions along ideological lines, which was also confirmed during the 2022 United States midterm elections. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the results of the 2022 U.S. midterm elections and the topics that were covered during the campaign. A dataset consisting of 52,688 tweets in total was created by collecting tweets of senators, representatives and governors who participated in the elections one month before the start of the elections. Using unsupervised machine learning, topic modeling is built on the collected data and visualized to represent topics. Furthermore, supervised machine learning is used to classify tweets to the corresponding political party, whereas sentiment analysis is carried out in order to detect polarity and subjectivity. Tweets from participating politicians, U.S. states and involved parties were found to correlate with polarizing topics. This study hereby explored the relationship between the topics that were creating a divide between Democrats and Republicans during their campaign and the 2022 U.S. midterm election outcomes. This research found that polarizing topics permeated the Twitter (today known as X) campaign, and that all elections were classified as highly subjective. In the Senate and House elections, this classification analysis showed significant misclassification rates of 21.37% and 24.15%, respectively, indicating that Republican tweets often aligned with traditional Democratic narratives.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Information Systems

Reference75 articles.

1. Political astroturfing on twitter: How to coordinate a disinformation campaign;Keller;Political Commun.,2020

2. Keyes IV, W.A. (2020). Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Colloquium on Impact, The Institute for Responsible Citizenship. Available online: https://www.theinstitute.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Complete-Colloquium-on-Impact-1.pdf#page=64.

3. Cook, A. (2021). Religious Republicans and Diverse Democrats: Asymmetric Polarisation and the Politics of Abortion in the United States. [Master’s Thesis, Macquarie University].

4. Politicians and the policy agenda: Does use of Twitter by the US Congress direct New York Times content?;Shapiro;Policy Internet,2017

5. Television Advertising in the 2022 Midterms;Franz;Forum,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3