Floret Biofortification of Broccoli Using Amino Acids Coupled with Selenium under Different Surfactants: A Case Study of Cultivating Functional Foods
Author:
Bouranis Dimitris L.12ORCID, Stylianidis Georgios P.1, Manta Vassiliki1, Karousis Evangelos N.1, Tzanaki Andriani1ORCID, Dimitriadi Despina3, Bouzas Emmanuel A.4, Siyiannis Vassilis F.5, Constantinou-Kokotou Violetta4, Chorianopoulou Styliani N.12ORCID, Bloem Elke6ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Plant Physiology & Morphology Laboratory, Crop Science Department, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 118 55 Athens, Greece 2. PlanTerra Institute for Plant Nutrition & Soil Quality, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 118 55 Athens, Greece 3. Karvelas AVEE, 80 km N.R. Athens - Lamia, 32200 Ypato, Greece 4. Chemical Laboratories, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece 5. Geoponiki SA, 26.5 km Lavrion Avenue, 194 00 Koropi, Greece 6. Julius Kuehn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Bundesallee 58, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
Abstract
Broccoli serves as a functional food because it can accumulate selenium (Se), well-known bioactive amino-acid-derived secondary metabolites, and polyphenols. The chemical and physical properties of Se are very similar to those of sulfur (S), and competition between sulfate and selenate for uptake and assimilation has been demonstrated. Towards an efficient agronomic fortification of broccoli florets, the working questions were whether we could overcome this competition by exogenously applying the S-containing amino acids cysteine (Cys) or/and methionine (Met), or/and the precursors of Glucosinolate (GSL) types along with Se application. Broccoli plants were cultivated in a greenhouse and at the beginning of floret growth, we exogenously applied sodium selenate in the concentration gradient of 0, 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 mM to study the impact of increased Se concentration on the organic S (Sorg) content of the floret. The Se concentration of 0.2 mM (Se0.2) was coupled with the application of Cys, Met, their combination, or a mixture of phenylalanine, tryptophane, and Met. The application took place through fertigation or foliar application (FA) by adding isodecyl alcohol ethoxylate (IAE) or a silicon ethoxylate (SiE) surfactant. Fresh biomass, dry mass, and Se accumulation in florets were evaluated, along with their contents of Sorg, chlorophylls (Chl), carotenoids (Car), glucoraphanin (GlRa), glucobrassicin (GlBra), glucoiberin (GlIb), and polyphenols (PPs), for the biofortification efficiency of the three application modes. From the studied selenium concentration gradient, the foliar application of 0.2 mM Se using silicon ethoxylate (SiE) as a surfactant provided the lowest commercially acceptable Se content in florets (239 μg or 0.3 μmol g−1 DM); it reduced Sorg (−45%), GlIb (−31%), and GlBr (−27%); and it increased Car (21%) and GlRa (27%). Coupled with amino acids, 0.2 mM Se provided commercially acceptable Se contents per floret only via foliar application. From the studied combinations, that of Met,Se0.2/FA,IAE provided the lowest Se content per floret (183 μg or 0.2 μmol g−1 DM) and increased Sorg (35%), Car (45%), and total Chl (27%), with no effect on PPs or GSLs. Cys,Met,Se0.2/FA,IAE and amino acid mix,Se0.2/FA,IAE increased Sorg content, too, by 36% and 16%, respectively. Thus, the foliar application with the IAE surfactant was able to increase Sorg, and methionine was the amino acid in common in these treatments, with varying positive effects on carotenoids and chlorophylls. Only the Cys,Met,Se0.2 combination presented positive effects on GSLs, especially GlRa, but it reduced the fresh mass of the floret. The foliar application with SiE as a surfactant failed to positively affect the organic S content. However, in all studied combinations of Se 0.2 mM with amino acids, the Se content per floret was commercially acceptable, the yield was not affected, the content of GSLs was increased (especially that of GlRa and GlIb), and PPs were not affected. The content of GlBr decreased except for the treatment with methionine (Met,Se0.2/FA,SiE) where GlBr remained unaffected. Hence, the combination of Se with the used amino acids and surfactants can provide enhanced biofortification efficiency in broccoli by providing florets as functional foods with enhanced functional properties.
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference64 articles.
1. Functional foods and the immune system: A review;Marcos;Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.,2002 2. Gupta, O.M., Pandey, V., Narwal, S., Sharma, P., Ram, S., and Singh, G.P. (2020). Wheat and Barley Grain Biofortification, Woodhead Publishing. 3. An overview of health-promoting compounds of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) and the effect of processing;Mahn;Food Sci. Technol. Int.,2012 4. Cultivation conditions and selenium fertilization alter the phenolic profile, glucosino- late, and sulforaphane content of broccoli;Robbins;J. Med. Food,2005 5. Chemical and biological characterisation of nutraceutical compounds of broccoli;Moreno;J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.,2006
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|