Cost Analysis of Using UAV Sprayers for Olive Fruit Fly Control
-
Published:2023-10-23
Issue:4
Volume:5
Page:1925-1942
-
ISSN:2624-7402
-
Container-title:AgriEngineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:AgriEngineering
Author:
Cavalaris Chris1ORCID, Tagarakis Aristotelis C.2ORCID, Kateris Dimitrios2ORCID, Bochtis Dionysis2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Fytokou Str., 38446 Volos, Greece 2. Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (iBO), Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd., 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are a novel up-and-coming technology with wide applicability and great potential to be used in agricultural systems for spraying applications. However, the cost-effectiveness of this application is still rather uncertain. The present study utilized actual data from field applications to analyze the critical components and parameters in the potential case of using UAV sprayers for the control of olive fruit flies in order to assess the operational costs. The results are compared with the costs of two traditional spraying methods: manual spaying by workers using backpack sprayers and manual spraying assisted by a tractor. The case of the olive fruit fly was selected because it involves costly, time consuming, and laborious manual spraying. Furthermore, the bait character of spraying in these applications does not require full canopy coverage, making it ideal for UAV applications. A parameterized computational model was developed to assess the costs of labor, capital spending, repair and maintenance, energy, licensees, fees and taxes, and storage for each of the three methods. In addition, the cost for surveillance was also accounted for with the UAV method. Consequently, a sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the impact of the most crucial parameters. The results showed that the cost of spraying with a UAV was 1.45 to 2 times higher than the traditional methods, mainly due to the high capital spending resulting from a low economic life. There are opportunities, however, of improving the economic performance, making it compatible to the traditional methods, by using a smaller UAV with longer lasting batteries and by expanding its annual use beyond the needs of olive fruit fly control.
Subject
Engineering (miscellaneous),Horticulture,Food Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference27 articles.
1. Anagnostis, A., Tagarakis, A.C., Kateris, D., Moysiadis, V., Sørensen, C.G., Pearson, S., and Bochtis, D. (2021). Orchard mapping with deep learning semantic segmentation. Sensors, 21. 2. Tagarakis, A.C., Filippou, E., Kalaitzidis, D., Benos, L., Busato, P., and Bochtis, D. (2022). Proposing UGV and UAV Systems for 3D Mapping of Orchard Environments. Sensors, 22. 3. Sylvester, G. (2018). E-Agriculture in Action: Drones for Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsandInternational Telecommunication Union. 4. SESAR (2016). European Drones Outlook Study, SESAR. 5. Morales-Rodríguez, P.A., Cano, E.C., Villena, J., and López-Perales, J.A. (2022). A Comparison between Conventional Sprayers and New UAV Sprayers: A Study Case of Vineyards and Olives in Extremadura (Spain). Agronomy, 12.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|