Comparison of QRNN and QRF Models in Forest Biomass Estimation Based on the Screening of VIs Using an Equidistant Quantile Method

Author:

Xu Xiao123ORCID,Zhang Xiaoli4ORCID,Shen Shouyun13,Zhu Guangyu5

Affiliation:

1. College of Landscape Architecture, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China

2. School of Logistics and Management Engineering, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China

3. Hunan Big Data Engineering Technology Research Center of Natural Protected Areas Landscape Resources, Changsha 410004, China

4. Key Laboratory of Southwest Mountain Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization, Ministry of Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650233, China

5. Forestry College, Central South University of Forest and Technology, Changsha 410004, China

Abstract

The investigation of a potential correlation between the filtered-out vegetation index and forest aboveground biomass (AGB) using the conventional variables screening method is crucial for enhancing the estimation accuracy. In this study, we examined the Pinus densata forests in Shangri-La and utilized 31 variables to establish quantile regression models for the AGB across 19 quantiles. The key variables associated with biomass were based on their significant correlation with the AGB in different quantiles, and the QRNN and QRF models were constructed accordingly. Furthermore, the optimal quartile models yielding the minimum mean error were combined as the best QRF (QRFb) and QRNN (QRNNb). The results were as follows: (1) certain bands exhibited significant relationships with the AGB in specific quantiles, highlighting the importance of band selection. (2) The vegetation index involving the band of blue and SWIR was more suitable for estimating the Pinus densata. (3) Both the QRNN and QRF models demonstrated their optimal performance in the 0.5 quantiles, with respective R2 values of 0.68 and 0.7. Moreover, the QRNNb achieved a high R2 value of 0.93, while the QRFb attained an R2 value of 0.86, effectively reducing the underestimation and overestimation. Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the variable screening methods that enhance estimation accuracy and mitigate underestimation and overestimation issues.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Science Research Fund Project

State Forestry Administration Key Disciplines

Hunan Province Double First-Class Cultivation Disciplines

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3