Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?

Published:2023-04-20 Issue:4 Volume:30 Page:4301-4310
ISSN:1718-7729
Container-title:Current Oncology
language:en
Short-container-title:Current Oncology

Author:

Franco Antonio¹²,Pellegrino Antony A.³⁴,De Nunzio Cosimo²^ORCID,Salkowski Morgan¹,Jackson Jamal C.¹,Zukowski Lucas B.¹,Checcucci Enrico⁵,Vourganti Srinivas¹,Chow Alexander K.¹,Porpiglia Francesco⁶,Kaouk Jihad⁷,Crivellaro Simone³,Autorino Riccardo¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

2. Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy

3. Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

4. Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy

5. Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Turin, Italy

6. Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy

7. Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

Abstract

In 2018, the da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urologic procedures. Available studies for the application of SP to prostate cancer surgery are limited. The aim of our study is to summarize the current evidence on the techniques and outcomes of SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARLP) procedures. A narrative review of the literature was performed in January 2023. Preliminary results suggest that SP-RALP is safe and feasible, and it can offer comparable outcomes to the standard multiport RALP. Extraperitoneal and transvesical SP-RALP appear to be the two most promising approaches, as they offer decreased invasiveness, potentially shorter length of stay, and better pain control. Long-term, high-quality data are missing and further validation with prospective studies across different sites is required.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/30/4/328/pdf

Reference47 articles.

1. National trends in management of localized prostate cancer: A populationbased analysis 2004–2013;Chen;Prostate,2018

2. Facility-level analysis of robot utilization across disciplines in the National Cancer Database;Fantus;J. Robot. Surg.,2018

3. The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists;Oberlin;Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig.,2016

4. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort;Pearce;J. Urol.,2016

5. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy;Ficarra;Eur. Urol.,2012

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Single port robot-assisted radical and simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases;2024-01-23

2. Robotic surgery in urology: Recent advances;Asian Journal of Urology;2023-10

3. Comment on: “Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Transvesical Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Technical Description and Perioperative Outcomes” by Soputro et al.;Journal of Endourology;2023-09-01

4. Current Status and Research Progress in the Application of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy;Advances in Clinical Medicine;2023