Stunning Compliance in Halal Slaughter: A Review of Current Scientific Knowledge
Author:
Sazili Awis Qurni12ORCID, Kumar Pavan34ORCID, Hayat Muhammad Nizam2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Halal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Putra Infoport, Serdang 43400, Malaysia 2. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia 3. Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia 4. Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana 141004, India
Abstract
Muslim scholars are not unanimous on the issue of the application of stunning in the halal slaughtering of animals. Appropriate stunning makes animals unconscious instantaneously, thus avoiding unnecessary pain and stress during the slaughtering of animals. The present review comprehensively summarizes the available scientific literature on stunning methods in view of their halal compliance during the slaughter of animals. The issue of maximum blood loss, reversibility of consciousness, and animals remaining alive during the halal cut are the key determinants of approval of stunning in the halal slaughter. Further, missed stuns due to poor maintenance of equipment, improper applications, and poor restraining necessitates additional stunning attempts, which further aggravates pain and stress in animals. Scientific findings suggest that halal-compliant stunning technologies are reversible, do not kill animals prior to the halal cut, and do not obstruct blood loss. There is a need to carry out further research on the refinement of available stunning technologies and their application, proper restraints, proper identification of the death status of animals, and assurance of animal welfare in commercial halal meat production.
Funder
Department of Standards Malaysia Universiti Putra Malaysia Geran Putra-IPS
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference138 articles.
1. Evans, A., Ayshe Anil, L., Bergeaud-Blackler, F., Cole, M., Terragni, L., Arne Tufte, P., and von Holleben, K. (2010). Public Debates on Religious Slaughter in Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Norway: A Comparative Report. C. University Dialrel Reports No. 4.2. Cardiff 2010, Cardiff University. 2. Report on Good and Adverse Practices-Animal Welfare Concerns in Relation to Slaughter Practices from the Viewpoint of Veterinary Sciences;Gregory;Dialrel. Deliv.,2010 3. Improving Animal Welfare Status and Meat Quality through Assessment of Stress Biomarkers: A Critical Review;Kumar;Meat. Sci.,2022 4. Kumar, P., Abubakar, A.A., Imlan, J.C., Ahmed, M.A., Goh, Y.-M., Kaka, U., Idrus, Z., and Sazili, A.Q. (2023). Importance of Knife Sharpness during Slaughter: Shariah and Kosher Perspective and Scientific Validation. Animals, 13. 5. Kumar, P., Abubakar, A.A., Verma, A.K., Umaraw, P., Nizam, M.H., Mehta, N., Ahmed, M.A., Kaka, U., and Sazili, A.Q. (2022). New Insights in Improving Sustainability in Meat Production: Opportunities and Challenges. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|