Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources
Author:
Bernauer FelixORCID, Behnen Kathrin, Wassermann JoachimORCID, Egdorf SvenORCID, Igel HeinerORCID, Donner StefanieORCID, Stammler Klaus, Hoffmann Mathias, Edme PascalORCID, Sollberger DavidORCID, Schmelzbach CédricORCID, Robertsson JohanORCID, Paitz PatrickORCID, Igel JonasORCID, Smolinski Krystyna, Fichtner AndreasORCID, Rossi YaraORCID, Izgi GizemORCID, Vollmer Daniel, Eibl Eva P. S.ORCID, Buske StefanORCID, Veress Christian, Guattari Frederic, Laudat Theo, Mattio Laurent, Sèbe OlivieORCID, Olivier Serge, Lallemand Charlie, Brunner Basil, Kurzych Anna T.ORCID, Dudek MichałORCID, Jaroszewicz Leszek R.ORCID, Kowalski Jerzy K., Bońkowski Piotr A.ORCID, Bobra PiotrORCID, Zembaty ZbigniewORCID, Vackář JiříORCID, Málek JiříORCID, Brokesova JohanaORCID
Abstract
Interest in measuring displacement gradients, such as rotation and strain, is growing in many areas of geophysical research. This results in an urgent demand for reliable and field-deployable instruments measuring these quantities. In order to further establish a high-quality standard for rotation and strain measurements in seismology, we organized a comparative sensor test experiment that took place in November 2019 at the Geophysical Observatory of the Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich in Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany. More than 24 different sensors, including three-component and single-component broadband rotational seismometers, six-component strong-motion sensors and Rotaphone systems, as well as the large ring laser gyroscopes ROMY and a Distributed Acoustic Sensing system, were involved in addition to 14 classical broadband seismometers and a 160 channel, 4.5 Hz geophone chain. The experiment consisted of two parts: during the first part, the sensors were co-located in a huddle test recording self-noise and signals from small, nearby explosions. In a second part, the sensors were distributed into the field in various array configurations recording seismic signals that were generated by small amounts of explosive and a Vibroseis truck. This paper presents details on the experimental setup and a first sensor performance comparison focusing on sensor self-noise, signal-to-noise ratios, and waveform similarities for the rotation rate sensors. Most of the sensors show a high level of coherency and waveform similarity within a narrow frequency range between 10 Hz and 20 Hz for recordings from a nearby explosion signal. Sensor as well as experiment design are critically accessed revealing the great need for reliable reference sensors.
Funder
Horizon 2020 European Research Council
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry
Reference65 articles.
1. Schwingungsart und Weg der Erdbebenwellen;Schlüter;Beiträge Geophys.,1903 2. Comparison of standard and ring laser rotational seismograms;McLeod;Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,1998 3. Ring laser detection of rotations from teleseismic waves 4. Continuous measurements of crustal deformation for the 1992 Landers earthquake sequence;Wyatt;Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,1994 5. Toward a Single‐Station Approach for Microzonation: Using Vertical Rotation Rate to Estimate Love‐Wave Dispersion Curves and Direction Finding
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|