Abstract
This paper addresses questions about the use of metacognitive strategies in argumentative writing based on multiple sources and the influence of this use on the quality of student texts. For this purpose, think-aloud protocols and texts from a research project on material-supported argumentative writing in 8th grade geography lessons are analyzed and discussed. The analysis is based on a model of metacognition in argumentative writing using multiple sources, which we also propose in this paper. The results show that the use of metacognitive strategies is a challenge for the investigated target group but that their use, in particular the deployment of goal-setting strategies and planning strategies, enables students to write better texts.
Subject
Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology
Reference35 articles.
1. Theoretische Ansätze zu Metakognition;Harms,2007
2. Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of MC;Brown,1978
3. MC aspects of problem-solving;Flavell,1976
4. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.
5. Metakognition und Lernen;Hasselhorn,1992
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献