Valorization of Pig Brains for Prime Quality Oil: A Comparative Evaluation of Organic-Solvent-Based and Solvent-Free Extractions
Author:
Chanted Jaruwan1ORCID, Anantawat Visaka1, Wongnen Chantira1, Aewsiri Tanong1, Panpipat Worawan1ORCID, Panya Atikorn2, Phonsatta Natthaporn2, Cheong Ling-Zhi3, Chaijan Manat1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Food Technology and Innovation Research Center of Excellence, School of Agricultural Technology and Food Industry, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand 2. Food Biotechnology Research Team, Functional Ingredients and Food Innovation Research Group, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Bangkok 12120, Thailand 3. School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Abstract
Pig processing industries have produced large quantities of by-products, which have either been discarded or used to make low-value products. This study aimed to provide recommendations for manufacturing edible oil from pig brains, thereby increasing the value of pork by-products. The experiment compared non-solvent extraction methods, specifically wet rendering and aqueous saline, to a standard solvent extraction method, the Bligh and Dyer method, for extracting oil from pig brains. The yield, color, fatty acid profile, a number of lipid classes, and lipid stability against lipolysis and oxidation of the pig brain oil were comprehensively compared, and the results revealed that these parameters varied depending on the extraction method. The wet rendering process provided the highest extracted oil yield (~13%), followed by the Bligh and Dyer method (~7%) and the aqueous saline method (~2.5%). The Bligh and Dyer method and wet rendering techniques produced a translucent yellow oil; however, an opaque light-brown-red oil was found in the aqueous saline method. The Bligh and Dyer method yielded the oil with the highest phospholipid, cholesterol, carotenoid, tocopherol, and free fatty acid contents (p < 0.05). Although the Bligh and Dyer method recovered the most unsaturated fatty acids, it also recovered more trans-fatty acids. Aqueous saline and wet rendering procedures yielded oil with low FFA levels (<1 g/100 g). The PV of the oil extracted using all methods was <1 meq/kg; however, the Bligh and Dyer method had a significant TBARS content (7.85 mg MDA equivalent/kg) compared to aqueous saline (1.75 mg MDA equivalent/kg) and wet rendering (1.14 mg MDA equivalent/kg) (p < 0.05). FTIR spectra of the pig brain oil revealed the presence of multiple components in varying quantities, as determined by chemical analysis experiments. Given the higher yield and lipid stability and the lower cholesterol and trans-fatty acid content, wet rendering can be regarded as a simple and environmentally friendly method for safely extracting quality edible oil from pig brains, which may play an important role in obtaining financial benefits, nutrition, the zero-waste approach, and increasing the utilization of by-products in the meat industry.
Funder
National Research Council of Thailand
Reference66 articles.
1. Jensen, W.K., Devine, C., and Dikeman, M. (2004). By-products. Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences, Elsevier Academic Press. [1st ed.]. 2. Department of Livestock (2024). Statistics Livestock in Thailand. 3. Innovations in value-addition of edible meat by-products;Aristoy;Meat Sci.,2012 4. Campbell, R.E., and Kenney, P.B. (1994). Edible By-products from the Production and Processing of Muscle Foods. Muscle Foods, Springer. [1st ed.]. 5. Nollet, L.M.L., and Toldrá, F. (2011). Introduction of offal meat: Definitions, regions, cultures, generalities. Handbook of Analysis of Edible Animal By-Products, CRC Press. [1st ed.].
|
|