Risk Perception-Based Project Contingency Management Framework

Author:

Ottaviani Filippo Maria1ORCID,De Marco Alberto1ORCID,Rafele Carlo1ORCID,Castelblanco Gabriel2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Management and Production Engineering, Polytechnic University of Turin, 10129 Turin, Italy

2. M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Construction Management, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Abstract

Project risk management (PRM) involves identifying risks, assessing their impact, and developing a contingency plan. A structured contingency management (CM) approach prevents subjective biases in analyzing risks and developing responses. Previous studies have either focused on improving the accuracy of risk estimates or analyzed, from a qualitative perspective, the relationships between perceived risk and project performance. This study aimed to improve PRM by providing a risk-perception-based contingency management framework (CMF). The CMF guides contingency depletion based on two short- and long-term cost overrun indicators and their respective thresholds. Thresholds and the initial contingency reserve amount are determined by applying the Monte Carlo method to a stochastic, discrete-event, finite-horizon, dynamic project simulation model. The study developed the CMF through a structured approach, validating the simulation model on eight specific project configurations. The results prove that the framework can be applied to any project, shaping the risk response strategy. This study contributes to PRM by explaining the relationships between risk perception and risk responses and providing a prescriptive CM tool.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference59 articles.

1. PMI (2019). The Standard for Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects, Project Management Institute, Inc.

2. Complexity Theory and System Dynamics for Project Risk Management;Chapman;Decision Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications,2017

3. Cost and time control of construction projects: Inhibiting factors and mitigating measures in practice;Olawale;Constr. Manag. Econ.,2010

4. Risk Paths in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Contractors;Liu;J. Constr. Eng. Manag.,2016

5. Cost Control in Mega Projects Using the Delphi Method;Gharaibeh;J. Manag. Eng.,2014

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Stakeholder Dynamics: Rethinking Roles and Responsibilities in User-Pay Transport PPP Projects;Journal of Construction Engineering and Management;2024-08

2. A MODEL FOR ASSESSING SHIPPING SAFETY WITHIN PROJECT-ORIENTATED RISK MANAGEMENT BASED ON HUMAN ELEMENT;Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport;2024-06-30

3. Financial system dynamics model for multidimensional flexibility in toll road PPPs: a life-cycle analysis;Construction Management and Economics;2024-04-27

4. Pandemic risks in PPPs: comparative analysis within developing countries;International Journal of Construction Management;2024-04-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3