Life Cycle Assessment and Building Information Modeling Integrated Approach: Carbon Footprint of Masonry and Timber-Frame Constructions in Single-Family Houses
-
Published:2023-10-31
Issue:21
Volume:15
Page:15486
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Mazur Łukasz1ORCID, Olenchuk Anatolii2
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, Helena Chodkowska University of Technology and Economics, Jagiellońska 82f, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland 2. Independent Researcher, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland
Abstract
The analysis of the carbon footprint of buildings is a key tool for assessing the impact of different buildings on climate change. Several frameworks and methodologies are available to calculate the footprint of buildings, including standards and norms, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and dedicated software tools. The use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) programme for these calculations is both scientifically justified and very practical. This scientific publication focuses on the application of a BIM-based research methodology to analyse the carbon footprint of a single-family house. The research process included the following steps: (i) the design of a single-family house with masonry construction using Archicad 26, BIM programme, (ii) simulation of the building energy performance using the EcoDesigner Star plug-in, (iii) LCA using the plug-in for Archicad, (iv) preparation of a second model with timber-frame construction for comparison, and (v) comparative analysis of the single-family house models with masonry construction (building A) and timber-frame (building B). Analysis of the results highlights significant differences in CO2e emissions between buildings and the varying impact of individual elements on the total CO2e emissions of the buildings studied. Building A had significantly higher net emissions, amounting to 43,226.94 kg CO2e, in stark contrast to Building B’s significantly lower 13,522.13 kg CO2e. This discrepancy was also mirrored in the emission intensity, with Building A emitting at a rate of 281.06 kg CO2e/m2 compared to Building B’s 96.72 kg CO2e/m2. These findings are relevant for future work on sustainable building design and construction aiming to minimise negative environmental impacts. The goal of minimising the cumulative carbon footprint of buildings is critical to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and combating climate change.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference89 articles.
1. Mazur, Ł., Bać, A., Vaverková, M.D., Winkler, J., Nowysz, A., and Koda, E. (2022). Evaluation of the Quality of the Housing Environment Using Multi-Criteria Analysis That Includes Energy Efficiency: A Review. Energies, 15. 2. Shen, F., Simayi, Z., Yang, S., Mamitimin, Y., Zhang, X., and Zhang, Y. (2023). A Bibliometric Review of Household Carbon Footprint during 2000–2022. Sustainability, 15. 3. Yan, X., Cui, S., Xu, L., Lin, J., and Ali, G. (2018). Carbon Footprints of Urban Residential Buildings: A Household Survey-Based Approach. Sustainability, 10. 4. Isaksson, R., Rosvall, M., Espuny, M., Nunhes, T.V., and De Oliveira, O.J. (2022). How Is Building Sustainability Understood?—A Study of Research Papers and Sustainability Reports. Sustainability, 14. 5. (2023, September 10). Architecture 2030 Why the Building Sector?. Available online: https://architecture2030.org/.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|