Multi-Criterial Carbon Assessment of the City

Author:

Sobierajewicz Piotr1ORCID,Adamczyk Janusz2ORCID,Dylewski Robert3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Licealna 9 St., 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland

2. Institute of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Zielona Góra, Licealna 9 St., 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland

3. Institute of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Econometrics, University of Zielona Góra, Licealna 9 St., 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland

Abstract

Decision-makers in cities have difficulties in implementing an effective climate policy for their own building resources due to the heterogeneous and dispersed distribution of buildings with low energy classes and different management specifics. Special zones include old towns, pre-war buildings (before 1945), and those built by the end of the 20th century. There is a noticeable shortage of methods for the comprehensive assessment of the emissions of urban complexes, taking into account social, economic, and environmental aspects. Exemplary individual examples of good thermal modernization practices towards low-emission and zero-energy solutions do not solve the problem of the poor-quality urban environment. This article proposes a simple integrated assessment of CO2 emissions of separate urban zones using the example of a medium-sized city in Poland. The adopted ASEET assessment methodology takes into account socio-economic criteria, but above all, the technical and energy criteria of urban development. Sensitive information was collected from users and owners of buildings and gathered in a data matrix. From the inventory data on energy consumption and technical conditions related to socio-economic status, environmental indicators were introduced, which were called critical for their improvement. By analyzing local efficiency indicators Wei of individual development zones, we can influence TWCi, the total indicators for the city. In the case of the studied city of Gubin, the total final energy consumption indicator EKC is 252.68 kWh/m2/year and is 58% lower than the most energy-intensive zone I, for which EKI = 399.6 kWh/m2/year, similar to emission indicators EEj between zones. Therefore, energy efficiency or emission indicators as resultant characteristics of urbanized areas can be treated as sensitive parameters in administrative activities, for example when planning thermal modernization or health risk assessment. The recommended solutions for continuous monitoring of ecological identifiers of urban zones, especially those with the lowest technical status, are to facilitate the creation of own environmental urban policies in the future and directly affect the city’s climate in local and global terms. The environmental data obtained using the ASEET method can be digitized using various IT techniques and then the results can be visualized on a city map in the form of environmental urban mapping with an indication of the GIS system. As a result, simple methodological tools for city managers were indicated. In the authors’ opinion, the ASEET method can serve urban policy, especially energy and climate policy, because the instrument for calculation is a database of indicators from subsequent periods of monitoring one’s own urban development.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference49 articles.

1. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Renovation Wave for Europe—Greening Our Buildings, Creating Jobs, Improving Lives, COM(2020) 662 Final, European Commission. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0662.

2. Raimundo, A.M., Sousa, A.M., and Oliveira, A.V.M. (2023). Assessment of Energy, Environmental and Economic Costs of Buildings’ Thermal Insulation–Influence of Type of Use and Climate. Buildings, 13.

3. Shukla, P.R., Skea, L., Slade, R., Al Khourtdajie, A., van Diemen, R., McCollum, D., Pathak, M., Some, S., Vyas, P., and Fradera, R. (2022). Technical Summary. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group Ill to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.

4. (2020). Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment, Accompanying the Document, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Stepping Up Europe’s 2030 Climate Ambition Investing in a Climate-Neutral Future for the Benefit of Our People, SWD (2020) 176 Final, European Commission. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020SC0176.

5. Sokołowski, J., Kiełczewska, A., and Lewandowski, P. (2024, March 23). Defining and Measuring Energy Poverty in Poland, IBS RESEARCH REPORT 01. Available online: https://ibs.org.pl/app/uploads/2019/01/IBS_Research_Report_01_2019.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3