Exploring Occupational Therapists’ Professional Identity: A Q-Method Study

Author:

Souto-Gómez Ana-Isabel1,Talavera-Valverde Miguel-Ángel23ORCID,García-de-la-Torre María-del-Pilar4ORCID,Márquez-Álvarez Luis-Javier5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Integra Saúde Unit Research, Escola Universitaria de Traballo Social, Universidade Santiago de Compostela, 15704 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

2. Integra Saúde Unit Research, Health Science Department, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidade da Coruña, 15570 A Coruña, Spain

3. Área Sanitaria de Ferrol, 15405 Ferrol, Spain

4. Psychology Department, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidade da Coruña, 15008 A Coruña, Spain

5. Área Sanitaria de Vigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain

Abstract

(1) Background: This study examines the nature of the rarely studied factors of the professional identity from an occupational therapist’s perspective. (2) Methods: Q-methodology was applied to identify the different perspectives. Participants were selected through a non-probability sampling procedure in the whole Spanish territory. Different assessment tools were considered, in order to develop an ad hoc tool which had 40 statements classified into four categories. A factor analysis was performed by applying Ken-Q analysis v.1.0. (3) Results: Thirty-seven occupational therapists participated in the study. Their diverse approaches revealed different perspectives that influence the professional identity of occupational therapists: professional identity, due to referents, a grey field on professional identity, reaffirming a common professional identity, the role of education and mentors on professional identity and the outcome of ongoing training, in order to develop the abovementioned identity. (4) Conclusions: Once the different aspects of the professional identity have been understood, future educational initiatives can be designed to adapt curricula to the professional scene.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3