Systematic Review (2003–2023): Exploring Technology-Supported Cross-Cultural Learning through Review Studies

Author:

Shadiev Rustam1ORCID,Sintawati Wayan2ORCID,Kerimbayev Nurassyl3ORCID,Altinay Fahriye4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310014, China

2. School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

3. Faculty of Information Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan

4. Societal Research and Development Center, Faculty of Education, Institute of Graduate Studies, Near East University, 99138 Nicosia, Turkey

Abstract

Technology-supported cross-cultural learning (TSCCL) is essential for effective intercultural communication, fostering global understanding, and facilitating collaboration in an interconnected world. Although previous studies and review articles have explored this field, a comprehensive analysis of trends and key findings in these reviews is lacking. This study aims to fill this gap by conducting a thorough examination of existing review studies. We employed a narrative synthesis approach consisting of three phases: preparation, organization, and abstraction. We selected and systematically reviewed thirty-one review articles published in twenty-five journals between 2003 and 2023. Our findings highlight key aspects of the reviewed articles, such as keywords, databases, selection criteria, theoretical foundations, content analysis, research questions, findings, and limitations related to technology-supported cross-cultural learning. We found that the researchers used various strategies for literature searches, including single, double, or multiple keywords depending on the study’s focus. The most commonly used keywords were telecollaboration, intercultural, communication, competence, language learning, and technology, indicating their significance in current research and practice. The number of papers reviewed varied across studies, as did the timeframe coverage, ranging from a few years to several decades. Researchers employed different databases, with Web of Science, ERIC, Scopus, and Google Scholar being the most popular choices. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to ensure methodological rigor and relevance. Theoretical foundations, such as the telecollaboration model and intercultural communicative competence model, were frequently employed. Open coding was the dominant content analysis approach used. Research questions were present in some studies but not explicitly stated in others. These findings shed light on the strategies and considerations used by researchers in conducting review studies on technology-supported cross-cultural learning, providing guidance for future research. The study presents a reference table encompassing all previously published reviews, which can be valuable for future scholars. By gaining insights from past studies and identifying unexplored research avenues, researchers can benefit from this report. Additionally, the implications and suggestions derived from this review study are valuable for educators and researchers in the TSCCL field. This review addresses gaps in the existing literature and contributes to advancing knowledge in the field of TSCCL.

Funder

Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of the People’s Republic of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference64 articles.

1. Telecollaboration to promote intercultural communicative competence: Insights from Indonesian EFL teachers;Batunan;Issues Educ. Res.,2023

2. Dooly, M. (2017). The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning, Wiley-Blackwell.

3. The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education;Hackett;Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ.,2023

4. Engaging Karen refugee students in science learning through a cross-cultural learning community;Harper;Int. J. Sci. Educ.,2017

5. Implementing computer-mediated intercultural communication in English education: A critical reflection on its pedagogical challenges;Lee;J. Comput. Assist. Learn.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3