Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
Abstract
A primary strategy led by the food industry to improve the sustainability of the agricultural food supply is the development of modern plant-based alternatives. The information provided via marketing and product packaging provides consumers with the expectation that these products provide a similar product experience to conventional products, yet it is not well understood whether these commercial alternative products are comparable to traditional animal-based products. To aid in developing improved plant-based products, this study aimed to compare the quality and physical attributes of commercially available plant-based and dairy yogurts. Using instrumental methods, commercially available yogurt products were analyzed for their pH, titratable acidity, color, water activity, moisture content, and rheology, which included 13 plant-based (almond, cashew, coconut, oat, soy) and 8 whole-milk dairy yogurts. The present study reveals that the plant-based and dairy yogurts had no significant differences in pH, lactic acid, water activity, or moisture content. However, there were significant differences in the color and texture properties between the plant-based and dairy yogurts. Additionally, significant differences were observed across the plant-based yogurt products in terms of their color and texture properties. This highlights the need for additional studies to determine how individual ingredients influence the physical characteristics and textural properties to direct the development of plant-based yogurts. Improving upon the physicochemical properties of plant-based yogurt may encourage more consumers to adopt a more sustainable diet.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment
Department of Food Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst
Reference55 articles.
1. Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., and Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities, Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
2. Life cycle assessment of animal-based foods and plant-based protein-rich alternatives: An environmental perspective;Detzel;J. Sci. Food Agric.,2022
3. The carbon footprint of meat and dairy proteins: A practical perspective to guide low carbon footprint dietary choices;Gaillac;J. Clean. Prod.,2021
4. Assessing the carbon footprint across the supply chain: Cow milk vs. soy drink;Coluccia;Sci. Total Environ.,2022
5. A review of research on plant-based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes;He;Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.,2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献