Comparison of Physical and Compositional Attributes between Commercial Plant-Based and Dairy Yogurts

Author:

Marlapati Likhitha1,Basha Rabia F. S.1,Navarre Amelia1,Kinchla Amanda J.1ORCID,Nolden Alissa A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

Abstract

A primary strategy led by the food industry to improve the sustainability of the agricultural food supply is the development of modern plant-based alternatives. The information provided via marketing and product packaging provides consumers with the expectation that these products provide a similar product experience to conventional products, yet it is not well understood whether these commercial alternative products are comparable to traditional animal-based products. To aid in developing improved plant-based products, this study aimed to compare the quality and physical attributes of commercially available plant-based and dairy yogurts. Using instrumental methods, commercially available yogurt products were analyzed for their pH, titratable acidity, color, water activity, moisture content, and rheology, which included 13 plant-based (almond, cashew, coconut, oat, soy) and 8 whole-milk dairy yogurts. The present study reveals that the plant-based and dairy yogurts had no significant differences in pH, lactic acid, water activity, or moisture content. However, there were significant differences in the color and texture properties between the plant-based and dairy yogurts. Additionally, significant differences were observed across the plant-based yogurt products in terms of their color and texture properties. This highlights the need for additional studies to determine how individual ingredients influence the physical characteristics and textural properties to direct the development of plant-based yogurts. Improving upon the physicochemical properties of plant-based yogurt may encourage more consumers to adopt a more sustainable diet.

Funder

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment

Department of Food Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference55 articles.

1. Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., and Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities, Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

2. Life cycle assessment of animal-based foods and plant-based protein-rich alternatives: An environmental perspective;Detzel;J. Sci. Food Agric.,2022

3. The carbon footprint of meat and dairy proteins: A practical perspective to guide low carbon footprint dietary choices;Gaillac;J. Clean. Prod.,2021

4. Assessing the carbon footprint across the supply chain: Cow milk vs. soy drink;Coluccia;Sci. Total Environ.,2022

5. A review of research on plant-based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes;He;Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3