Abstract
Objective: Constructing state law amid local laws is a new phenomenon; the challenge is creating a free-problem situation when the two systems meet. It seems impossible for the two to be allies and support each other. When they do meet, their relationship is just a compromise. The research object is a shift in the paradigm of law transformation related to constructing state law amid local law.
Method: We employed a juridical normative with different treatments where the law is not the foundation but the theories, concepts, norms, and beliefs of scholars based on the orientation of the analysis objects.
Results: Findings confirm that state law (positive law or law) is designed following the legism or positivism paradigm or belief. As such, legal transformation in its embodiment is oriented towards legal unity (positive law-state law). Hence, norms or values that do not originate from authorized lawmakers are undesirable to achieve a single uniform model (one legal model for all). In turn, the attempt to privilege the ideal law as the only law that is appropriate and valid and which is believed to be able to be the answer to every problem has yet to be fulfilled. Undoubtedly, state law, declared exclusive, is not only not objective, but becomes weak. The result is the rejection of community values as a strengthening substance, failing to meet expectations. Finally, the people consider state law a disturbance to the peace of life and a form of injustice and burden. Its presence does not create unity and collaboration that strengthens and supports one another but raises enmity.
Conclusion: The construction of state law amid local law always refers to legal positivism, which positions the singleness of law in a positive (formal) form of law. State law is seen as the only law recognized as valid because it originates from the state, while another law is not recognized. With this standard trend (perspective), a paradigm shift in the construction of state law occurs so that when legal transformation or legal change occurs, society experiences a shock of new values
Publisher
South Florida Publishing LLC
Subject
Law,Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference9 articles.
1. Bastiat, F. (2010). Hukum Rancangan Klasik Untuk Membangun Masyarakat Merdeka. Translated by Z. Rofiqi. Jakarta: Freedom Institute Jakarta kerjasama Akademi Merdeka Malaysia.
2. Borichev, K., Radchenko, T., Moiseeva, A., Chasovnikova, O. (2022). Countering International Terrorism: Problems of Criminal-Legal Qualification. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 1-11, https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v10i1.224.
3. Dimyati, K. (2010). Teorisasi Hukum, Studi Tentang Perkembangan Pemikiran Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
4. Ivanov, D., Khmelev, S., Gubko, I., Gaeyov, A., Gorlova, Y. (2021). Providing Compensation for the Detriment Caused By Crime When Referring Criminal Cases to Court in the Russian Criminal Proceedings. Journal of Law and Sustainable Developemnt, 9(2), 1-9, https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v9i2.29.
5. Iwantoro, S. (1989). Prisma No. 7 Tahun XVIII. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献