Constructing State Law amid Local Laws: A Shift in the Paradigm of Legal Transformation

Author:

Polontoh Herry M. PolontohORCID,Liauw YantjeORCID

Abstract

Objective: Constructing state law amid local laws is a new phenomenon; the challenge is creating a free-problem situation when the two systems meet. It seems impossible for the two to be allies and support each other. When they do meet, their relationship is just a compromise. The research object is a shift in the paradigm of law transformation related to constructing state law amid local law.   Method: We employed a juridical normative with different treatments where the law is not the foundation but the theories, concepts, norms, and beliefs of scholars based on the orientation of the analysis objects.   Results: Findings confirm that state law (positive law or law) is designed following the legism or positivism paradigm or belief. As such, legal transformation in its embodiment is oriented towards legal unity (positive law-state law). Hence, norms or values that do not originate from authorized lawmakers are undesirable to achieve a single uniform model (one legal model for all). In turn, the attempt to privilege the ideal law as the only law that is appropriate and valid and which is believed to be able to be the answer to every problem has yet to be fulfilled. Undoubtedly, state law, declared exclusive, is not only not objective, but becomes weak. The result is the rejection of community values as a strengthening substance, failing to meet expectations. Finally, the people consider state law a disturbance to the peace of life and a form of injustice and burden. Its presence does not create unity and collaboration that strengthens and supports one another but raises enmity.   Conclusion: The construction of state law amid local law always refers to legal positivism, which positions the singleness of law in a positive (formal) form of law. State law is seen as the only law recognized as valid because it originates from the state, while another law is not recognized. With this standard trend (perspective), a paradigm shift in the construction of state law occurs so that when legal transformation or legal change occurs, society experiences a shock of new values

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

Subject

Law,Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Reference9 articles.

1. Bastiat, F. (2010). Hukum Rancangan Klasik Untuk Membangun Masyarakat Merdeka. Translated by Z. Rofiqi. Jakarta: Freedom Institute Jakarta kerjasama Akademi Merdeka Malaysia.

2. Borichev, K., Radchenko, T., Moiseeva, A., Chasovnikova, O. (2022). Countering International Terrorism: Problems of Criminal-Legal Qualification. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 1-11, https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v10i1.224.

3. Dimyati, K. (2010). Teorisasi Hukum, Studi Tentang Perkembangan Pemikiran Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

4. Ivanov, D., Khmelev, S., Gubko, I., Gaeyov, A., Gorlova, Y. (2021). Providing Compensation for the Detriment Caused By Crime When Referring Criminal Cases to Court in the Russian Criminal Proceedings. Journal of Law and Sustainable Developemnt, 9(2), 1-9, https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v9i2.29.

5. Iwantoro, S. (1989). Prisma No. 7 Tahun XVIII. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3