Weltanschauung of the Indonesian Law: A Study on the Development of the Weltanschauung in the Indonesian Law (1945-2000)

Author:

Dimyati KhudzaifahORCID,Rochman SaepulORCID,Azhari Aidul FitriciadaORCID,Wardiono KelikORCID

Abstract

Objective: This article aimed to understand the factors of the development of the Indonesian legal weltanschauung as an effort to understand the potential of conflict that may happen post-Reformation in Indonesia.   Theoretical framework: The theoretical material in this article are state documents and legal regulations that support the rise and fall of the power regimes in Indonesia through the methodological weltanschauung in the study on the legal fundamentals and the state basis that has uncovered the conflicts that have so far been hidden and unresolved between the weltanschauung of the customary, Islamic, and colonial laws. This worldview conflict actually forms modern Indonesian law since its independence.   Results and conclusion: The weltanschauung of the Indonesian law was agreed upon on June 22nd, 1945 named Pancasila is contained in Paragraph IV of the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution or what is called Jakarta Charter. But in its development, there have been changes to its substance and official interpretations. These changes were simultaneous with various riots, rebellions, and violations of human rights under the ideological motive. But in the Reformation Era, its official interpretation tended to be based on legal pluralism.   Originality/value: Pancasila is deemed as an absolute and permanent thing, although historical facts show otherwise. Pancasila that was created on June 22nd, 1945 was changed on August 18th, 1945 by eradicating some words in its first principle. It also changed on October 29th, 1949 and August 15th, 1950 when its sentences were simplified. Towards the end of Soekarno’s reign, specifically in 1964, the word “Guided Democracy” was added after social justice in the fifth principle. Pancasila was then formalized by the New Order with the August 18th, 1945 format.

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

Subject

Law,Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Reference100 articles.

1. Absori, Wardiono, K., & Rochman, S. (2015). Hukum Profetik: Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Hukum Non-Sistematik. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

2. Affandi, H. (2020). Pancasila: Eksistensi dan Aktualisasi. Yogyakarta: Andi.

3. Albialtar. (2020). Suara Dari Ufuk Timur: Penziarahan Tujuh Dekade STT Intim Makassar. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

4. Arenas, R. D. M., Gonzales, C. A. D., Cruz, O. D. C., Carbajal, E. N., & Lugo, J. P. (2023). Carl Schmitt, Deepening the Pragmatic Ethos in the Machiavellian Tradition of the Twentieth Century. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.863

5. Barbour, C. (2012). The Maker of Lies: Simmel, Mendacity and the Economy of Faith. Theory, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412456566

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3