Strengthening Indonesia's Cabinet System: Embracing the Zaken Cabinet

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to explore the evolution of Indonesia's cabinet system and argues for the adoption of the "Zaken Cabinet" model, emphasizing its potential to enhance governance effectiveness and address contemporary challenges. The objective is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the Zaken Cabinet and its applicability to the Indonesian context.   Theoretical Framework: The research is grounded in historical and contemporary contexts, comparing Indonesia's current cabinet system with the Zaken Cabinet model, which is characterized by technocratic, non-partisan, and expertise-driven attributes. The theoretical framework examines how such a model can bridge governance gaps and contribute to efficient decision-making, policy implementation, and administrative performance.   Method: This study employs a qualitative approach, utilizing historical analysis, comparative assessment, and policy evaluation. Data is collected through literature review, document analysis, and expert interviews. The research focuses on the merits and demerits of the Zaken Cabinet model and its potential phased adoption in Indonesia.   Result and Conclusion: The analysis reveals that adopting the Zaken Cabinet model in Indonesia could significantly enhance governance efficiency. While there are challenges in implementing this model, its benefits, such as non-partisanship and expertise-driven decision-making, outweigh the drawbacks. In conclusion, embracing the Zaken Cabinet can reinforce Indonesia's cabinet system, leading to more effective governance and sustainable development.   Originality/Value: This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on governance in Indonesia by proposing the adoption of the Zaken Cabinet model as a novel approach. The study's value lies in its potential to address contemporary challenges, strengthen decision-making, and improve administrative performance in the country's evolving governance landscape.