International Standards and Principles, Foreign Legislative Experience of Judicial Control in the Investigation Stage

Author:

Akhpanov ArstanORCID,Ongarbaev ErkinORCID,Tukiev AslanORCID,Omarbekova MadeniyetORCID,Kulbaeva MayaORCID

Abstract

Objective: The article develops the idea of the need to implement the norms of international legal acts into national legislation, borrowing positive foreign experience in implementing the norms regulating judicial control. At the same time, it is noted that the introduction of international standards and principles into national legal mechanisms is possible only taking into account the peculiarities of the legal system and the legal system of the state.   Theoretical framework: A selective analysis of the implementation of judicial control in foreign countries (France, Germany, Austria, etc.) was carried out, similarities and differences from a similar system in the Republic of Kazakhstan were revealed.  The author, exploring the control powers of the court at the international level, tried to determine the importance of international standards and principles in ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings in the Republic of Kazakhstan.   Method: In the course of the research, a set of the following special methods was used: system-structural, formal-legal and logical analysis of the problem; expert assessment of the relevant norms of national legislation and practice of its application; interpretation of legal norms; comparative legal research; constructive-critical analysis of conceptual approaches to the problems under study; legal modeling of risks and costs of election as a prosecutor and the authorization by the investigating judge of measures of criminal procedural coercion.   Results and conclusion: Based on the comparative legal study of the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of Kazakhstan, France, Germany, England, Italy and Spain, it seems possible to note that judicial control has both similar and distinctive features. What unites these or other models is that the main purpose of judicial control is the protection, protection and restoration of the rights and freedoms of subjects of legal relations at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process.   Originality and value: One of the important signs of the rule of law, the construction of which is proclaimed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, is the exercise of judicial control over the preliminary investigation. Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) adhere to this vector of development of criminal procedure legislation. Currently, international standards and principles governing the protection, protection, restoration of human rights and freedoms accumulate the most progressive, successfully tested legal concepts, which were the natural result of the tendency to strengthen guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings.  The article is devoted to the problems of legal regulation of judicial control at the stage of preliminary investigation related to compliance with international standards.

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

Subject

Law,Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Reference21 articles.

1. Ahpanov A.N., Han A.L., SHagirova M. 2006. Ensuring the constitutional right to protection in criminal proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan) // Pravovaya reforma v Kazahstane. № 4(36), 32-34.

2. Akhpanov A.N.,2018. Podozrevayemyy. obvinyayemyy: voprosy sovershenstvovaniya protsessualno-pravovogo statusa // Vestnik ENU im. L.N.Gumileva. Seriya: Pravo. № 3 (124). 62-67.

3. Analytical report "Judicial authorization of arrest in the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2011. Warsaw. Available from: https://online.zakon.kz//Document/?doc_id=30983793#pos=5;-108.

4. Azarov V.A., Tarichko I.YU.,2004. The function of judicial control in the history, theory and practice of the criminal process of Russia: Monografiya. – Omsk: Omskij gosudarstvennyj universitet im. F.M. Dostoevskogo.

5. Barabanov P.K. Italian criminal trial, 2019. Available from: https://www.iuaj.net/node/2702

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Strengthening Indonesia's Cabinet System: Embracing the Zaken Cabinet;Journal of Law and Sustainable Development;2023-12-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3