Quantitative Comparison of Project Performance between Project Delivery Systems-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Quantitative Comparison of Project Performance between Project Delivery Systems

Published:2020-11 Issue:6 Volume:36 Page:04020082
ISSN:0742-597X
Container-title:Journal of Management in Engineering
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Manage. Eng.

Author:

Ibrahim Michael W.¹^ORCID,Hanna Awad²,Kievet Dave³

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor and Director of Construction and Engineering Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, California State Univ., Los Angeles, E&T A-215, 5151 State University Dr., Los Angeles, CA 90032 (corresponding author). ORCID: .

2. Boldt Company Professor and Chair, Construction Engineering and Management Program, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 2320 Engineering Hall, 1415 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706.

3. Chief Operating Officer, The Boldt Company, 2525 Roemer Rd., Appleton, WI 54912.

Publisher

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management,General Engineering,Industrial relations

Link

http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000837

Reference72 articles.

1. Causes, Early Warning Signs, and Impacts of Out-of-Sequence Construction: Expert-Based Survey Analysis

2. Developing a Rating Score for Out-of-Sequence Construction

3. Akinsiku O. A. Akintola O. Ameh and A. Ige. 2014. “Contributions of the construction project team to cost overruns: The contractors’ perspective.” In Proc. Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network 1528–1536. Atlanta GA: Construction Institute of ASCE.

4. Owner–Contractor Work Structures: Process Approach

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Decentralized project delivery on the crypto commons: Conceptualization, governance mechanisms, and future research directions;Project Leadership and Society;2024-12

2. A research and development framework for integrated project delivery;Construction Management and Economics;2024-08-24

3. Integrated project delivery (IPD) capabilities on reducing claims in urban underground projects: A hybrid FAHP-FTOPSIS approach;Sustainable Futures;2024-06

4. Collaborative and life cycle-based project delivery for environmentally sustainable building construction: views of Finnish project professionals and building operation and maintenance experts;Smart and Sustainable Built Environment;2024-05-17

5. Multi-criteria decision support model for selecting the appropriate construction management firm;International Journal of Construction Management;2024-04-10