Finding the Event Structure of Neuronal Spike Trains

Author:

Toups J. Vincent1,Fellous Jean-Marc2,Thomas Peter J.3,Sejnowski Terrence J.4,Tiesinga Paul H.5

Affiliation:

1. Computational Neurophysics Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, U.S.A.

2. Psychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A.

3. Computational Biomathematics Laboratory, Departments of Mathematics, Biology and Cognitive Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, U.S.A., and Department of Neuroscience, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, U.S.A.

4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA 92186, U.S.A., and Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A.

5. Computational Neurophysics Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, U.S.A., and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands

Abstract

Neurons in sensory systems convey information about physical stimuli in their spike trains. In vitro, single neurons respond precisely and reliably to the repeated injection of the same fluctuating current, producing regions of elevated firing rate, termed events. Analysis of these spike trains reveals that multiple distinct spike patterns can be identified as trial-to-trial correlations between spike times (Fellous, Tiesinga, Thomas, & Sejnowski, 2004 ). Finding events in data with realistic spiking statistics is challenging because events belonging to different spike patterns may overlap. We propose a method for finding spiking events that uses contextual information to disambiguate which pattern a trial belongs to. The procedure can be applied to spike trains of the same neuron across multiple trials to detect and separate responses obtained during different brain states. The procedure can also be applied to spike trains from multiple simultaneously recorded neurons in order to identify volleys of near-synchronous activity or to distinguish between excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The procedure was tested using artificial data as well as recordings in vitro in response to fluctuating current waveforms.

Publisher

MIT Press - Journals

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3