Design seismic track irregularity for high‐speed railways

Author:

Yu Jian1,Zhou Wangbao12ORCID,Jiang Lizhong12,Yan Wen3,Liu Xiang4

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil Engineering Central South University Changsha China

2. National Engineering Laboratory for High‐Speed Railway Construction Changsha China

3. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co. Ltd Xian China

4. School of Civil Engineering Fujian University of Technology Fuzhou China

Abstract

AbstractThere has been no consensus on post‐earthquake operating plan for high‐speed railway trains. In this paper, two three‐dimensional coupling model of track‐bridge system without and with trains for high‐speed railways were developed, and their performance were verified based on shaking table tests. The equivalent method of design seismic track irregularity for random structures was discussed, and the amplitude response spectra of design seismic track irregularity for all levels of seismic intensity were proposed. In addition, the rationality of design seismic track irregularity was evaluated based on engineering case analysis, providing a theoretical foundation of formulating post‐earthquake contingency plans for high‐speed railways. The results show that when span number increases, the design seismic track irregularity amplitude increases and then tends to be stable; when the span number reaches 9, the train dynamic response gradually becomes stable; the random structures with arbitrary span numbers are equivalent to a specific 9‐span structure when constructing design seismic track irregularity. When the seismic intensity is low, there is no significant difference in shape and amplitude between the measured pre‐earthquake and post‐earthquake track alignment irregularities, and the train can normally run with no significant deceleration required. The train dynamic response under the design post‐earthquake track irregularity is greater than that under the measured post‐earthquake track irregularity, indicating that the design seismic track irregularity has a reasonable safety margin and a good feasibility in engineering practice.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3