Trait‐mediated responses of caterpillar communities to spongy moth outbreaks and subsequent tebufenozide treatments

Author:

Leroy Benjamin M. L.1ORCID,Rabl Dominik2ORCID,Püls Marcel12,Hochrein Sophia2ORCID,Bae Soyeon12ORCID,Müller Jörg23ORCID,Hebert Paul D. N.45ORCID,Kuzmina Maria L.5ORCID,Zakharov Evgeny V.45ORCID,Lemme Hannes6,Hahn W. Andreas6,Hilmers Torben7ORCID,Jacobs Martin7ORCID,Kienlein Sebastian1,Pretzsch Hans7ORCID,Heidrich Lea2ORCID,Seibold Sebastian189ORCID,Roth Nicolas2ORCID,Vogel Sebastian2ORCID,Kriegel Peter2ORCID,Weisser Wolfgang W.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Life Science Systems School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich Freising Germany

2. Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology Biocenter, University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany

3. Bavarian Forest National Park Grafenau Germany

4. Department of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada

5. Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada

6. Department of Forest Protection Bavarian State Institute of Forestry Freising Germany

7. Chair of Forest Growth and Yield Science, Department of Life Science Systems School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich Freising Germany

8. Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Research Group, Department of Life Science Systems, School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Freising Germany

9. Berchtesgaden National Park Berchtesgaden Germany

Abstract

AbstractOutbreaks of the spongy moth Lymantria dispar can have devastating impacts on forest resources and ecosystems. Lepidoptera‐specific insecticides, such as Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (BTK) and tebufenozide, are often deployed to prevent heavy defoliation of the forest canopy. While it has been suggested that using BTK poses less risk to non‐target Lepidoptera than leaving an outbreak untreated, in situ testing of this assumption has been impeded by methodological challenges. The trade‐offs between insecticide use and outbreaks have yet to be addressed for tebufenozide, which is believed to have stronger side effects than BTK. We investigated the short‐term trade‐offs between tebufenozide treatments and no‐action strategies for the non‐target herbivore community in forest canopies. Over 3 years, Lepidoptera and Symphyta larvae were sampled by canopy fogging in 48 oak stands in southeast Germany during and after a spongy moth outbreak. Half of the sites were treated with tebufenozide and changes in canopy cover were monitored. We contrasted the impacts of tebufenozide and defoliator outbreaks on the abundance, diversity, and functional structure of chewing herbivore communities. Tebufenozide treatments strongly reduced Lepidoptera up to 6 weeks after spraying. Populations gradually converged back to control levels after 2 years. Shelter‐building species dominated caterpillar assemblages in treated plots in the post‐spray weeks, while flight‐dimorphic species were slow to recover and remained underrepresented in treated stands 2 years post‐treatment. Spongy moth outbreaks had minor effects on leaf chewer communities. Summer Lepidoptera decreased only when severe defoliation occurred, whereas Symphyta declined 1 year after defoliation. Polyphagous species with only partial host plant overlap with the spongy moth were absent from heavily defoliated sites, suggesting greater sensitivity of generalists to defoliation‐induced plant responses. These results demonstrate that both tebufenozide treatments and spongy moth outbreaks alter canopy herbivore communities. Tebufenozide had a stronger and longer lasting impact, but it was restricted to Lepidoptera, whereas the outbreak affected both Lepidoptera and Symphyta. These results are tied to the fact that only half of the outbreak sites experienced severe defoliation. This highlights the limited accuracy of current defoliation forecast methods, which are used as the basis for the decision to spray insecticides.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3