Evaluation of eight Bayesian genomic prediction models for three micronutrient traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Author:

Meher Prabina Kumar1ORCID,Gupta Ajit1,Rustgi Sachin2ORCID,Mir Reyazul Rouf3ORCID,Kumar Anuj45,Kumar Jitendra6,Balyan Harindra Singh7,Gupta Pushpendra Kumar7

Affiliation:

1. Division of Statistical Genetics ICAR—Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute New Delhi India

2. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Pee Dee Research and Education Centre Clemson University Florence South Carolina USA

3. Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding SKUAST‐Kashmir Kashmir India

4. Department of Microbiology and Immunology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

5. Laboratory of Immunity Shantou University Medical College Shantou People's Republic of China

6. National Agri‐Food Biotechnology Institute (NABI) Ajitgarh India

7. Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding Chaudhary Charan Singh University Meerut India

Abstract

AbstractIn wheat, genomic prediction accuracy (GPA) was assessed for three micronutrient traits (grain iron, grain zinc, and β‐carotenoid concentrations) using eight Bayesian regression models. For this purpose, data on 246 accessions, each genotyped with 17,937 DArT markers, were utilized. The phenotypic data on traits were available for 2013–2014 from Powerkheda (Madhya Pradesh) and for 2014–2015 from Meerut (Uttar Pradesh), India. The accuracy of the models was measured in terms of reliability, which was computed following a repeated cross‐validation approach. The predictions were obtained independently for each of the two environments after adjusting for the local effects and across environments after adjusting for the environmental effects. The Bayes ridge regression (BayesRR) model outperformed the other seven models, whereas BayesLASSO (BayesL) was the least efficient. The GPA increased with an increase in the size of the training set as well as with an increase in marker density. The GPA values differed for the three traits and were higher for the best linear unbiased estimate (BLUE) (obtained after adjusting for the environmental effects) relative to those for the two environments. The GPA also remained unaffected after accounting for the population structure. The results of the present study suggest that only the best model should be used for the estimations of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) before their use for genomic selection to improve the grain micronutrient contents.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3