Assessing personality at risk in personnel selection and development-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing personality at risk in personnel selection and development

Published:2009-02 Issue:1 Volume:23 Page:51-69
ISSN:0890-2070
Container-title:European Journal of Personality
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Pers

Author:

De Fruyt Filip¹,De Clercq Barbara J.¹,Miller Joshua²,Rolland Jean‐Pierre³,Jung Sung‐Cheol³,Taris Ruben⁴,Furnham Adrian⁵,Van Hiel Alain¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Developmental Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium

2. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

3. Université Paris Ouest, STAPS, Paris, France

4. Politieacademie Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5. Department of Psychology, University College London, London, UK

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the validity and usefulness of a count technique to screen for potential personality dysfunctioning in NEO‐PI‐R ratings obtained in selection and professional development assessments. The usefulness of this screening technique for Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychologists is demonstrated in five different samples that were administered the NEO‐PI‐R for selection or development purposes. Three additional samples served as normative data to compute FFM PD count cut‐offs that can be used for selection and career development decisions. Evidence for the construct validity of 6 out of 10 FFM PD counts was provided, and all FFM PD compound scales were significantly related to important criteria, including the final selection decision, the results of a behaviourally oriented selection interview and self‐rated work competencies. The practical utility and limitations of this count technique for personnel selection and development are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Psychology

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/per.703

Reference35 articles.

1. Yes, Personality Matters: Moving on to More Important Matters

2. Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?

3. Assessment and Diagnosis of Personality Disorder: Perennial Issues and an Emerging Reconceptualization

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘LinkedIn, LinkedIn on the screen, who is the greatest and smartest ever seen?’: A machine learning approach using valid LinkedIn cues to predict narcissism and intelligence;Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology;2024-07-16

2. Smart is the new strong: An investigation of the contribution of physical, cognitive, anthropometric, and personality variables to success in a Tier 1 special forces qualification course.;Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology;2024-05

3. Reciprocal relationships between narcissism and agentic versus communal work activities across the first 6 years of the career.;Journal of Applied Psychology;2023-12-07

4. MBTI and Aberrant Personality Traits: Dark-Side Trait Correlates of the Myers Briggs Type Inventory;Psychology;2022

5. Bright and Dark-Side Traits Associated With Interests in Commerce vs Science: Different Personality Profiles of the Scientist-Practitioner;Psychological Reports;2021-03-27