Mastery, models, messengers, and mixed emotions: Examining the development of engineering self‐efficacy by gender

Author:

Chen Xiao‐Yin1ORCID,Usher Ellen L.12ORCID,Roeder Madelyn1ORCID,Johnson Alecia R.1ORCID,Kennedy Marian S.3ORCID,Mamaril Natasha A.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA

2. Office of Applied Research and Education Science Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

3. Department of Materials Science and Engineering Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USA

4. Grainger College of Engineering University of Illinois Urbana Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEngineering self‐efficacy, or the belief in one's own capabilities to complete engineering tasks, has been shown to predict greater motivation, academic performance, and retention of engineering students. Investigating the types of experiences that influence engineering students' self‐efficacy can reveal ways to support students in their undergraduate engineering programs.Purpose/Hypothesis(es)The purpose of this study was to qualitatively examine how undergraduate engineering students describe the sources of their engineering self‐efficacy and whether patterns in students' responses differed by gender.Design/MethodParticipants (N = 654) were undergraduate engineering students attending two public, land‐grant universities in the U.S. Open‐ended survey questions were used to identify the events, social experiences, and emotions that students described as relevant to their engineering self‐efficacy. Chi‐square analyses were used to investigate whether response patterns varied by gender.ResultsStudents described enactive performances as their most salient source of self‐efficacy, but interesting insights also emerged about how engineering students draw from social and emotional experiences when developing their self‐efficacy. Women more often referred to social sources of self‐efficacy and reported fewer positive emotions than did men.ConclusionFindings suggest ways that educators can provide more targeted opportunities for students to develop their self‐efficacy in engineering.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Engineering,Education

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3