Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department

Author:

Loo Stephanie1,Anderson Emily2,Lin Jessica G.2,Smith Perri3,Murray Genevra F.4,Hong Haeyeon5,Jacquet Gabrielle A.25,Koul Rashmi5,Rosenmoss Sophie2,James Thea25,Shankar Kalpana Narayan56,de la Vega Pablo Buitron23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Department of General Internal Medicine Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health New York University New York New York USA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

6. Department of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe emergency department (ED) is an opportune venue to screen for unmet social needs and connect patients with social services. This quality improvement study incorporates both qualitative and quantitative data to examine unmet social needs among ED patients and program implementation.MethodsFrom September 2020 to December 2021, an urban safety‐net hospital adult ED implemented a social needs screening and referral program. Trained emergency staff screened eligible patients for 5 social needs (housing, food, transportation, utilities, employment), giving resource guides to patients who screened positive (THRIVE+). We collected screening data from the electronic health record, conducted semi‐structured interviews with THRIVE+ patients and clinical staff, and directly observed discharge interactions.ResultsEmergency staff screened 58.5% of eligible patients for social risk. Of the screened patients, 27.0% reported at least 1 unmet social need. Of those, 74.8% requested assistance. Screened patients reported housing insecurity (16.3%) as the most prevalent unmet social need followed by food insecurity (13.3%) and unemployment (8.7%). Among interviewed patients, 57.1% recalled being screened, but only 24.5% recalled receiving resource guides. Patients who received guides reported little success connecting with resources and supported universal guide dissemination. Staff expressed preference for warm handoff to social services. Of 13 observed discharge interactions, clinical staff only discussed guides with 2 patients, with no positive endorsement of the guides in any observed interactions.ConclusionsAn ED social needs screening program can be moderately feasible and accepted. We identified housing as the most prevalent need. Significant gaps exist between screening and referral, with few patients receiving resources. Further training and workflow optimization are underway.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3