Author:
Lemon Stephenie C.,LeClair Amy M.,Christenson Erika,Amburgey Deborah,FitzGerald Madyson,Cabral Howard,Lloyd-Travaglini Chris,Clark Cheryl R.,Wang Feng Qing,Ross Joellen,Ohrenberger Ellen,Haas Jennifer S.,Freund Karen N.,Battaglia Tracy A.,James Ted A.,Shenkel Jessica,Gershman Susan T.,Kennedy Mark,Levine Anne,Warner Erica T.,Ko Naomi Y.,Amburgey Debi,Vance Julia,Xiao Victoria,Zhao Tony,Cabral Howard J.,Chen Clara,Lloyd-Travaglini Christine,Dugas Julianne,Contreras Magnolia,Freedman Rachel A.,White Karen Burns,Gunn Christine,Moy Beverly,Marotta Caylin,Wint Amy J,Parsons Susan K.,Rajabiun Serena,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Social needs inhibit receipt of timely medical care. Social needs screening is a vital part of comprehensive cancer care, and patient navigators are well-positioned to screen for and address social needs. This mixed methods project describes social needs screening implementation in a prospective pragmatic patient navigation intervention trial for minoritized women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
Methods
Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP) was conducted at five cancer care sites in Boston, MA from 2018 to 2022. The patient navigation intervention protocol included completion of a social needs screening survey covering 9 domains (e.g., food, transportation) within 90 days of intake. We estimated the proportion of patients who received a social needs screening within 90 days of navigation intake. A multivariable log binomial regression model estimated the adjusted rate ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of patient socio-demographic characteristics and screening delivery. Key informant interviews with navigators (n = 8) and patients (n = 21) assessed screening acceptability and factors that facilitate and impede implementation. Using a convergent, parallel mixed methods approach, findings from each data source were integrated to interpret study results.
Results
Patients’ (n = 588) mean age was 59 (SD = 13); 45% were non-Hispanic Black and 27% were Hispanic. Sixty-nine percent of patients in the navigators’ caseloads received social needs screening. Patients of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (aRR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.06–1.48) and those with Medicare insurance (aRR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.04–1.23) were more likely to be screened. Screening was universally acceptable to navigators and generally acceptable to patients. Systems-based supports for improving implementation were identified.
Conclusions
Social needs screening was acceptable, yet with modest implementation. Continued systems-based efforts to integrate social needs screening in medical care are needed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC