Affiliation:
1. Dublin Zoo Phoenix Park Dublin Ireland
2. School of Natural Sciences, Zoology Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
3. Species360 Conservation Science Alliance Bloomington Minnesota USA
4. San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Beckman Center for Conservation Research Escondido California USA
5. Interdisciplinary Centre on Population Dynamics University of Southern Denmark Odense M Denmark
6. Department of Biology University of Southern Denmark Odense M Denmark
7. School of Biological Sciences University of Queensland St Lucia Australia
Abstract
AbstractAlthough cryobanking represents a powerful conservation tool, a lack of standardized information on the species represented in global cryobanks, and inconsistent prioritization of species for future sampling, hinder the conservation potential of cryobanking, resulting in missed conservation opportunities. We analyze the representation of amphibian, bird, mammal, and reptile species within the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Frozen Zoo® living cell collection (as of April 2019) and implement a qualitative framework for the prioritization of species for future sampling. We use global conservation assessment schemes (including the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species™, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), the Alliance for Zero Extinction, the EDGE of Existence, and Climate Change Vulnerability), and opportunities for sample acquisition from the global zoo and aquarium community, to identify priority species for cryobanking. We show that 965 species, including 5% of all IUCN Red List “Threatened” amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles, were represented in the collection and that sampling from within existing zoo and aquarium collections could increase representation to 16.6% (by sampling an additional 707 “Threatened” species). High‐priority species for future cryobanking efforts include the whooping crane (Grus americana), crested ibis (Nipponia nippon), and Siberian crane (Leucogeranus leucogeranus). Each of these species are listed under every conservation assessment scheme and have ex situ populations available for sampling. We also provide species prioritizations based on subsets of these assessment schemes together with sampling opportunities from the global zoo and aquarium community. We highlight the difficulties in obtaining in situ samples, and encourage the formation of a global cryobanking database together with the establishment of new cryobanks in biodiversity‐rich regions.
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,General Medicine