Affiliation:
1. Oregon State University
2. National Park Service
3. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
4. Oregon State University and California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Abstract
To improve wildlife connectivity across the U.S., managers need to identify and prioritize movement barriers in need of mitigation. Roadway barriers may be semi-permeable and allow some movement either at-grade or via non-wildlife underpasses, but permeability can depend on species-specific behaviors and underpass characteristics. We used a combination of trail cameras and GPS collars to monitor desert bighorn (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) movement near highways and use of non-wildlife underpasses along I-15 and I-40 near Mojave National Preserve, CA. After year 1, we installed guzzlers near target underpasses in a before-after-control-impact (BACI) framework to assess changes in desert bighorn detection over 2 years post-installation. GPS collar data confirmed that desert bighorn moved close enough to 10 of 11 focal underpasses to easily access and use these structures to cross I-15 and I-40. Trail cameras at five sites recorded desert bighorn using habitat very near underpasses and even resting in a culvert tunnel, but no data indicated desert bighorn used underpasses or culverts to cross either highway. Meanwhile, species including coyote (Canis latrans), bobcat (Lynx rufus), and feral burro (Equus asinus) regularly used monitored underpasses. Adding a novel water resource did not significantly increase desert bighorn detection rate on underpass cameras at impact sites relative to control sites after 2 years, and no images suggested bighorn used the installed guzzlers. Patterns of desert bighorn habitat use in the region and lack of observed highway crossings during the study indicate generally low permeability of I-15 and I-40 for this species and a mismatch between non-wildlife underpass locations, design, and desert bighorn behavior.
Publisher
California Fish and Wildlife Journal, California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Reference49 articles.
1. • Ahumada, J. A., E. Fegraus, T. Birch, N. Flores, R. Kays, T. G. O’Brien, J. Palmer, S. Schuttler, J. Y. Zhao, W. Jetz, M. Kinnaird, S. Kulkarni, A. Lyet, D. Thau, M. Duong, R. Oliver, and A. Dancer. 2020. Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and other passive sensor wildlife data for the planet. Environmental Conservation 47:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892919000298
2. • Aiello, C. M., N. L. Galloway, K. Fratella, P. Prentice, N. W. Darby, D. Hughson and C.W. Epps. 2018. Enhancing function of an increasingly fragmented metapopulation of desert bighorn sheep. Last updated September 2023. Available from: http://n2t.net/ark:/63614/w12003007 (Accessed via wildlifeinsights.org: 16 September 2023).
3. • Aiello, C. M., N. L. Galloway, P. R. Prentice, N. W. Darby, D. Hughson, and C. W. Epps. 2023. Movement models and simulation reveal highway impacts and mitigation opportunities for a metapopulation-distributed species. Landscape Ecology 38:1085–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01600-6
4. • Anderson, D. J., J. T. Villepique, and V. C. Bleich. 2017. Resource selection by desert bighorn relative to limestone mines. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 54:13–30.
5. • Arni M., H. J. Skaug, A. Nielsen, C. W. Berg, K. Kristensen, M. Maechler, K. J. van Bentham, B. M. Bolker and M. E. Brooks. 2017. glmmTMB: Generalized Linear Mixed Models using Template Model Builder. R package v.0.1.3. Available from: https://github.com/glmmTMB