A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers

Author:

Lister Raymond1,Adams Elizabeth S.2,Fitzgerald Sue3,Fone William4,Hamer John5,Lindholm Morten6,McCartney Robert7,Moström Jan Erik8,Sanders Kate9,Seppälä Otto10,Simon Beth11,Thomas Lynda12

Affiliation:

1. University of Technology, Sydney Broadway, NSW, Australia

2. James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA

3. Metropolitan State University, St. Paul, MN

4. Staffordshire University, Stafford, ST, United Kingdom

5. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

6. Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

7. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT

8. Umeá University, Umeá, Sweden

9. Rhode Island College, Providence, RI

10. Helsinki University of Technology, TKK, Finland

11. University of San Diego, San Diego, CA

12. University of Wales, Aberystwyth

Abstract

A study by a ITiCSE 2001 working group ("the McCracken Group") established that many students do not know how to program at the conclusion of their introductory courses. A popular explanation for this incapacity is that the students lack the ability to problem-solve. That is, they lack the ability to take a problem description, decompose it into sub-problems and implement them, then assemble the pieces into a complete solution. An alternative explanation is that many students have a fragile grasp of both basic programming principles and the ability to systematically carry out routine programming tasks, such as tracing (or "desk checking") through code. This ITiCSE 2004 working group studied the alternative explanation, by testing students from seven countries, in two ways. First, students were tested on their ability to predict the outcome of executing a short piece of code. Second, students were tested on their ability, when given the desired function of short piece of near-complete code, to select the correct completion of the code from a small set of possibilities. Many students were weak at these tasks, especially the latter task, suggesting that such students have a fragile grasp of skills that are a prerequisite for problem-solving.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Cited by 268 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Why Students Cannot Easily Integrate Component Skills: An Investigation of the Composition Effect in Programming;ACM Transactions on Computing Education;2024-09-14

2. The use of makerspaces for the development of computational thinking skills and dispositions: pedagogical practices facilitators use;Computer Science Education;2024-07-12

3. Grasping the Unseen: TA Insights into Teaching Subtle Concepts in Computer Science;Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1;2024-07-03

4. Conceptual Metaphor Theory in Action: Insights into Student Understanding of Computing Concepts;Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1;2024-03-07

5. Supporting Novice Programmers via the Lens of Instructional Design;Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design;2024-02-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3