How shall we assess this?

Author:

Carter Janet1,Ala-Mutka Kirsti2,Fuller Ursula1,Dick Martin3,English John4,Fone William5,Sheard Judy3

Affiliation:

1. University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

2. Tampere University of Technology, Finland

3. Monash University, Victoria, Australia

4. University of Brighton, Brighton, UK

5. Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK

Abstract

Increased class sizes are forcing academics to reconsider approaches to setting and marking assessments for their students. Distributed and distance learning are creating some of the biggest changes. Some educators are embracing new technologies but others are more wary of what they do not know. In order to address this issue it is first necessary to investigate the types of assessment currently in use and the perceptions that are held by academics with and without experience of the new technologies that are becoming available.In this paper we present the findings of an international survey of Computer Science academics teaching a variety of topics within the discipline. The findings are split into two sections: a snapshot of current assessment practices and an analysis of respondents' perceptions of Computer Aided Assessment (CAA). Academics' opinions about the advantages and disadvantages of CAA are split in line with level of experience of using such techniques. Those with no experience of CAA suggest that it cannot be used to test higher-order learning outcomes and that the quality of the immediate feedback is poor; these negative opinions diminish as experience is gained.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Cited by 65 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Helpful do Novice Programmers Find the Feedback of an Automated Repair Tool?;2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE);2023-11-28

2. Can Coding Education Go Completely Online? Time, Work, and Relationship in Online Courses;East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal;2023-08-15

3. Analyzing the Quality of Submissions in Online Programming Courses;2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET);2023-05

4. Automated Assessment: Experiences From the Trenches;Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Computing Education Conference;2023-01-30

5. Evaluating CodeClusters for Effectively Providing Feedback on Code Submissions;2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE);2022-10-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3