Affiliation:
1. Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore
2. Fudan University, China
Abstract
While AI-assisted individual qualitative analysis has been substantially studied, AI-assisted
collaborative
qualitative analysis (CQA) – a process that involves multiple researchers working together to interpret data—remains relatively unexplored. After identifying CQA practices and design opportunities through formative interviews, we designed and implemented CoAIcoder, a tool leveraging AI to enhance human-to-human collaboration within CQA through four distinct collaboration methods. With a between-subject design, we evaluated CoAIcoder with 32 pairs of CQA-trained participants across common CQA phases under each collaboration method. Our findings suggest that while using a shared AI model as a mediator among coders could improve CQA efficiency and foster agreement more quickly in the early coding stage, it might affect the final code diversity. We also emphasize the need to consider the independence level when using AI to assist human-to-human collaboration in various CQA scenarios. Lastly, we suggest design implications for future AI-assisted CQA systems.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction
Reference72 articles.
1. Roehl Sybing How research AI can enhance your analysis. Retrieved September 16 2023 from https://atlasti.com/research-hub/how-research-ai-can-enhance-your-analysis#how-research-ai-can-enhance-your-analysis
2. MaxQDA. MAXQDA TeamCloud for Interaction and Data Exchange. Retrieved September 16 2023 from https://www.maxqda.com/teamcloud
3. IBM. What is text mining?. Retrieved September 16 2023 from https://www.ibm.com/topics/text-mining
4. The role of cognitive conflict in constructivist theory: An implementation aimed at science teachers
5. Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献