Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo
Abstract
Comprehensive land claims agreements are important tools for empowering Aboriginal peoples. A crucial part of these treaties is the certainty provision, which deals with the nature of Aboriginal rights and title once a treaty is signed. Up until 1986, the Crown insisted on one certainty formula for all treaties. After 1986, however, Aboriginal groups were able to negotiate alternatives to the original certainty provision. This paper seeks to explain why alternatives to the original certainty provision emerged after 1986. It suggests that government perceptions of policy failure, generated by Aboriginal opposition to the extinguishment clause, resulted in the Crown engaging in instrumental learning.
Publisher
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference83 articles.
1. Explaining Aboriginal Treaty Negotiation Outcomes in Canada: The
Cases of the Inuit and the Innu in Labrador
2. Andersen, T.Personal interview with the former LIA Vice President and current First Minister, Department of Nunatsiavut Affairs, Nain, Labrador. 2006, February20
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献