Evaluating Veterinarians’ and Veterinary Students’ Knowledge and Clinical Use of Pulse Oximetry

Abstract

Rationale for the study – We hypothesized that veterinarians and veterinary students may lack key knowledge about pulse oximetry, which may result in this type of patient monitor not being used on appropriate patient populations or to its full capabilities. Methodology – A questionnaire was developed to assess an individual’s knowledge and understanding of pulse oximetry. Residents and specialists in anesthesiology and critical care at several academic institutions were surveyed first to assess the questionnaire for clarity and to serve as a control group. General veterinary practitioners (GPs) attending continuing education courses at the University of Georgia were surveyed over a 24-month period. Students entering their senior-year anesthesiology rotation at the University of Georgia were also surveyed. Results – Residents and specialists (69% correct responses) scored significantly higher than senior students (46%), who scored significantly higher than GPs (34%). Only 15% of GPs and 21% of senior students reported that they had received training in pulse oximetry in school. Those who had received training scored significantly higher than those who had not. Many GPs did not report using a pulse oximeter on their critical patients under anesthesia, a group that would be expected to benefit from its use. Conclusions – Veterinarians have a poor understanding of how pulse oximetry works, the information it provides, and how best to apply it to their patients. Furthermore, the respondents did not use pulse oximeters in a manner that would yield the most information and result in the greatest benefit to the patient relative to the cost of the instrument. Didactic training in veterinary curricula and during continuing education opportunities continues to be necessary in order to produce veterinarians who have an understanding of the technologies available to improve patient care.