Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region supporting fixed dental prostheses: 5‐year results of an open multicenter randomized controlled trial-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region supporting fixed dental prostheses: 5‐year results of an open multicenter randomized controlled trial

Published:2020-10-23 Issue:1 Volume:32 Page:15-22
ISSN:0905-7161
Container-title:Clinical Oral Implants Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Clin Oral Impl Res

Author:

Guljé Felix L.¹²,Meijer Henny J. A.³^ORCID,Abrahamsson Ingemar⁴,Barwacz Christopher A.⁵,Chen Stephen⁶,Palmer Paul J.⁷,Zadeh Homayoun⁸,Stanford Clark M.⁹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of GroningenUniversity Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

2. Center for Dental Implants De Mondhoek Apeldoorn The Netherlands

3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Implant Dentistry University of GroningenUniversity Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

4. Department of Periodontology University of GothenburgThe Sahlgrenska Academy Gothenburg Sweden

5. Department of Family Dentistry University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics Iowa City IA USA

6. Department of Periodontics Melbourne, School of Dental Science University of Melbourne Melbourne Vic. Australia

7. King’s College London Dental Institute at Guy's King's and St Thomas' Hospitals London UK

8. VISTA Institute for Therapeutic Innovations Woodland Hills CA USA

9. Department of Restorative Dentistry University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago IL USA

Funder

DENTSPLY Implants

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oral Surgery

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/clr.13674

Reference20 articles.

1. Clinical evidence on titanium–zirconium dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2. Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions;Berglundh T.;Journal of Periodontology,2018

3. Interventions for Dental Implant Placement in Atrophic Edentulous Mandibles: Vertical Bone Augmentation and Alternative Treatments. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

4. Three‐year prospective randomized comparative assessment of anterior maxillary single implants with different abutment interfaces;Cooper L.;International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2019

5. In Vitro Evaluation of the Primary Stability of Short and Conventional Implants

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants (≤6 mm) Used as an Alternative to Longer (>6 mm) Implants for the Rehabilitation of Posterior Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review of RCTs;Dentistry Journal;2024-06-17

2. Short (≤6 mm) compared with ≥10‐mm dental implants in different clinical scenarios: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta‐analysis, trial sequential analysis and quality of evidence grading;Journal of Clinical Periodontology;2024-05-20

3. Randomized controlled multi‐centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10‐year data;Journal of Clinical Periodontology;2024-01-31

4. Extra-short implants (≤ 6.5 mm in length) in atrophic and non-atrophic sites to support screw-retained full-arch restoration: a retrospective clinical study;International Journal of Implant Dentistry;2023-09-13

5. Systematic review evaluating the influence of the prosthetic material and prosthetic design on the clinical outcomes of implant‐supported multi‐unit fixed dental prosthesis in the posterior area;Clinical Oral Implants Research;2023-09