Systematic review evaluating the influence of the prosthetic material and prosthetic design on the clinical outcomes of implant‐supported multi‐unit fixed dental prosthesis in the posterior area

Author:

Pjetursson Bjarni E.12ORCID,Sailer Irena2ORCID,Merino‐Higuera Elizabeth23ORCID,Spies Benedikt Christopher4ORCID,Burkhardt Felix4ORCID,Karasan Duygu2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland

2. Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

3. Department of Prosthodontics, University Center of Health Sciences University of Guadalajara Guadalajara Mexico

4. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe objectives of the study were to assess the survival, failure, and technical complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prosthesis (iFDPs) with pontic or splinted crown (iSpC) designs in the posterior area and compare the influence of prosthetic materials and prosthetic design on the outcomes.MethodsElectronic and manual searches were performed to identify randomized‐, prospective‐, and retrospective clinical trials with follow‐up time of ≥12 months, evaluating the clinical outcomes of posterior iFDPs with pontic or iSpCs. Survival and complication rates were analyzed using robust Poisson's regression models.ResultsThirty‐two studies reporting on 42 study arms were included in the present systematic review. The meta‐analysis of the included studies indicated estimated 3‐year survival rates of 98.3% (95%CI: 95.6–99.3%) for porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal (PFM) iFDPs, 97.5% (95%CI: 95.5–98.7%) for veneered zirconia (Zr) iFDPs with pontic, 98.9% (95%CI: 96.8–99.6%) for monolithic or micro‐veneered zirconia iFDPs with pontic, and 97.0% (95%CI: 84.8–99.9%) for lithium disilicate iFDPs with pontics. The survival rates for different material combination showed no statistically significant differences. Veneered restorations, overall, showed significantly (p < .01) higher ceramic fracture and chipping rates compared with monolithic restorations. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in survival rates (98.3% [95%CI: 95.6–99.3%] vs. 99.1% [95%CI: 97.6–99.7%]) and overall complication rates between PFM iFDPs with pontic and PFM iSpCs.ConclusionsBased on the data identified by this systematic review, PFM, veneered Zr, and monolithic Zr iFDPs with pontic and iSpCs showed similarly high short‐term survival rates in the posterior area. Veneered restorations exhibit ceramic chipping more often than monolithic restorations, with the highest fracture rate reported for veneered Zr iFDPs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oral Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3